Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Switching to Symmetric MOM6 #255

Closed
helenmacdonald opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 7 comments
Closed

Switching to Symmetric MOM6 #255

helenmacdonald opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@helenmacdonald
Copy link

Regional MOM6 needs to run on a symmetrical executable whilst access-om3 is running on a non-symmetrical executable. Switching access-om3 to symmetrical will reduce the number of executables that need to be supported.

The difference between symmetric and non-symmetric mom6 is that there is some overlap of grid cells on adjacent tiles. This uses a very small amount of extra memory but may make some gradient calculations easier. The central version of MOM6 runs tests to ensure that switching between symmetrical on non-symmetrical does not change the model solution but we may need to test on the access-om3 models to ensure that this is still the case with our parameterisations.

The suggestion is that we should compare a test case of access-om3 run in symmetrical and non-symmetrical mode to check that there are no issues before switching over

@access-hive-bot
Copy link

This issue has been mentioned on ACCESS Hive Community Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/cosima-twg-meeting-minutes-2025/4067/2

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor

I built with mom_symmetric and the normal repro test passes. .

In my view that is enough to make the change ?

anton-seaice added a commit to ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3 that referenced this issue Jan 15, 2025
@chrisb13
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed and good timing!

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor

Yay - it only impacts the deployment, so ill put the change in deployment repo (probably ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3#33)

@chrisb13
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, makes sense. I just noticed that it's already there, though isn't it? Here, specifically.

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor

Yes - I was predicting the future there ;-)

anton-seaice added a commit to ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3 that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2025
Use mom symmetric memory per COSIMA/access-om3#255
@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor

This has been implemented in ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3@6ef4337

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants