Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Allow rejudging when there is only a single judge #1902

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2022

Conversation

Ninjaclasher
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1902 (292122e) into master (03c91d2) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1902   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   46.25%   46.25%           
=======================================
  Files         231      231           
  Lines       13045    13045           
=======================================
  Hits         6034     6034           
  Misses       7011     7011           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
judge/bridge/judge_list.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 03c91d2...292122e. Read the comment docs.

@quantum5 quantum5 merged commit a5b2b16 into DMOJ:master Mar 22, 2022
@Ninjaclasher Ninjaclasher deleted the fix-single-judge-rejudge branch February 6, 2023 05:37
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants