You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Using graphtyper to create a vcf we are running into a problem of the vcf is not producing calls for samples that do have variants. Double checking with IGV we can see that the bam file of specific samples does have variants but when compared with the vcf, the vcf doesn't show that there are variants. We checked the average read depth of the samples using samtools and they do have good read depths.
Here's a screenshot of IGV comparison to the vcf (top row) and a sample (Kew122) that does have variants.
Graphtyper did work for most of our samples which looks like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Using graphtyper to create a vcf we are running into a problem of the vcf is not producing calls for samples that do have variants. Double checking with IGV we can see that the bam file of specific samples does have variants but when compared with the vcf, the vcf doesn't show that there are variants. We checked the average read depth of the samples using samtools and they do have good read depths.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27652/276521b76f79877603e9a565df17d49ec3ad2190" alt="Kew122_failed_vcf"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b3eb/8b3eb3bf24619f9792b17049d33500045a993f0f" alt="PIC_worked_vcf"
Here's a screenshot of IGV comparison to the vcf (top row) and a sample (Kew122) that does have variants.
Graphtyper did work for most of our samples which looks like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: