Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Genotype difference between Graphtyper & SURVIVOR #160

Open
Sreelekshmi-291 opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Genotype difference between Graphtyper & SURVIVOR #160

Sreelekshmi-291 opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@Sreelekshmi-291
Copy link

Hello @hannespetur

We merged approximately 1000 samples using two different approaches: the SVIMMER + Graphtyper combo and SURVIVOR. After noticing some discrepancies between the outputs from these two methods, we extracted a single sample to investigate the differences more closely. The following is a snippet of what we observed,

Image
here, "_G" is for the columns of Graphtyper & "_S" is for those of SURVIVOR.

As we see from the table above, for the variants called at the same POS, Graphtyper and SURVIVOR give 2 different Genotypes completely.
Also, We did not find any read supports in these locations in the sample's bam file.

What is particularly worrisome is that Graphtyper confidently calls a homozygous genotype at these positions, whereas SURVIVOR reports the genotype as missing.

Can you please provide some insights, that might help us figure out what is happening here?

Thank you

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant