Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Metapackage update for pytorch 1.4.0 #86

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

1297rohit
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rohitgeo
Copy link

@cleebp or @scw - can you merge this PR? It adds the links for metapackages for the DL backbones.

@scw
Copy link
Collaborator

scw commented Oct 18, 2024

@rohitgeo this needs updating to have it compatible across releases so the older links are maintained for users not on the latest release — I will take a look.

Copy link
Collaborator

@cleebp cleebp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the changes Shaun requested were around hosting the older links for all versions of Pro and Server, currently the organization is difficult to understand as a user from a pro/server version standpoint.

Previously this section was organized like:

Pro versions | Server versions | Backbones package
-|-|-
2.9—3.2 | 10.9.1—11.2 | [PyTorch 1.8 `arcgis_dl_backbones` package](https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ad8ecd2a45af4e3282a4d9ff455024be)
2.5—2.8 | 10.7.1—10.9.0 | [PyTorch 1.4 `arcgis_dl_backbones` package](https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=d404fd50d05d475f8d92eedb78e1c961)

Is it possible to return to an organization based on pro/server version instead of just arcgis/pytorch versions so users looking for links for versions like 2.9 and 10.9.1 (and older) can find their correct downloads? Still fine to list the pytorch versions, but generally users know their product version they are looking for and not the arcgis/pytorch version.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants