Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade eslint-config-expensify from 2.0.59 to 2.0.73 #821

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MelvinBot
Copy link

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade eslint-config-expensify from 2.0.59 to 2.0.73.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 12 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on a month ago.

Release notes
Package name: eslint-config-expensify from eslint-config-expensify GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade eslint-config-expensify from 2.0.59 to 2.0.73.

See this package in npm:
eslint-config-expensify

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/expensify/project/4945ebcf-d145-4524-893a-d9c905019a72?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2024 18:49
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from aldo-expensify and removed request for a team November 21, 2024 18:49
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants