Skip to content

[WIDP] fix: Use master instead of temp table on removeUpdatedData #20

[WIDP] fix: Use master instead of temp table on removeUpdatedData

[WIDP] fix: Use master instead of temp table on removeUpdatedData #20

Triggered via pull request March 4, 2025 11:29
Status Success
Total duration 15m 40s
Artifacts 6

run-tests.yml

on: pull_request
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

5 warnings
unit-test
Cache not found for keys: setup-java-Linux-x64-maven-0540f4d53156f68ac733f4d7043a6c0385668bbd510b41da1be9b4cb515f7ed8
integration-h2-test
Failed to save: Failed to CreateCacheEntry: Received non-retryable error: Failed request: (409) Conflict: cache entry with the same key, version, and scope already exists
integration-h2-test
Cache not found for keys: setup-java-Linux-x64-maven-0540f4d53156f68ac733f4d7043a6c0385668bbd510b41da1be9b4cb515f7ed8
integration-test
Failed to save: Failed to CreateCacheEntry: Received non-retryable error: Failed request: (409) Conflict: cache entry with the same key, version, and scope already exists
integration-test
Cache not found for keys: setup-java-Linux-x64-maven-0540f4d53156f68ac733f4d7043a6c0385668bbd510b41da1be9b4cb515f7ed8

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size
integration-h2-test-coverage
9.29 MB
integration-h2-test-surefire-reports
2.18 MB
integration-test-coverage
9.31 MB
integration-test-surefire-reports
5.88 MB
unit-test-coverage
9.08 MB
unit-test-surefire-reports
4.76 MB