Confusion in python symbol resolving when accessing fields in static class context

[oxisto]

Consider the following snipped:

a = 1

class MyClass:
   copyA = a # this should refer to global a

   def foo():
      self.a = 2

Because currently the PythonAddDeclarationPass is executed before the symbol resolver, it will "correctly" create a new dynamic field a in my class. Therefore, the symbol resolver will "correctly" resolve the reference a in the static class context to the field a. However, in reality, the static context is executed when the class definition is created and the resolution should go to the global a.

This is not easily fixable, unless we merge the PythonAddDeclarationPass into the symbol resolver and then try to resolve in EOG-like order (static class context, then methods) and create dynamic fields on the fly.