Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Prepare for official ROS2 release packaging #16

Open
2 tasks done
migranram opened this issue Mar 27, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks done

Prepare for official ROS2 release packaging #16

migranram opened this issue Mar 27, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement Enhancement of available features

Comments

@migranram
Copy link
Collaborator

migranram commented Mar 27, 2025

Problem

ROS2 buildfarm jobs are successful at building and testing the package, but the binaries packing is failing. See for example here.

ToDos

  • Package version cannot be obtained from git. Since the buildfarm builds the packages isolated.
  • Third-party libraries should be compiled and published in in a _vendor package. See *.

*: According to this post third packages which binaries are not available in the ROS-Index or as deb binaries for ubuntu should be published in a separated vendor package.

@migranram migranram added bug Something isn't working enhancement Enhancement of available features labels Mar 27, 2025
@migranram migranram self-assigned this Mar 27, 2025
migranram added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2025
@migranram
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The file about.qrc in resources was pointing to the LICENSE file in the root directory. This leads to an error in binary packing. See here for ROS2 CI output.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement Enhancement of available features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant