Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Capability to write to PHITS #31

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 19, 2024
Merged

Capability to write to PHITS #31

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

vwbus1967
Copy link
Contributor

Dear all,

I'm just wondering whether the PhitsFormat.py would be able to adopt in GEOUNED as an option or not?

I'm mainly using PHITS for radiation transport calculation.
PHITS geometry definition is very similar to the MCNP.
Therefore, mainly based on the MCNPFormat.py,
I tried to write the PHITSFormat.py to generate PHITS geometry input files.

 1. Chosen the graveyard surface as the boundary of the outer void region (-1) 
 2. Unified the auto-generated void regions when envelope and/or enclosure cells are not set
 3. Applied dummy MATERIAL DEFINITION block when dummyMat = True
 4. Applied VOLUME DEFINITION block when volCARD = True
 5. Eliminated the only MCNP related parts

With simple models, some tests are conducted successfully.
The generated input files work well in PHITS calculations.

Anyway, I’m just writing. I always respect your any decisions.
My respects to GEOUNED developing team is no change.
Thank you so much for developing.

Hope this someone's help,

Generation of transport input file for PHITS format.pdf

@psauvan psauvan changed the base branch from main to dev March 19, 2024 11:53
@psauvan psauvan merged commit 895e34d into GEOUNED-org:dev Mar 19, 2024
@psauvan
Copy link
Member

psauvan commented Mar 19, 2024

Thank you for your contribution!

@vwbus1967
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for accepting and also I must apologize for PR with pycaches.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants