-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
DOC: Update Doxygen XML for ITK 5.3.0 #411
DOC: Update Doxygen XML for ITK 5.3.0 #411
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typo in commit message: intentially -> intentionally ?
I am not sure why we are seeing these warnings: https://open.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?type=1&buildid=8385181 😕 |
Was the word "intentially" intentionally used in the commit message? |
No 😄 😆 |
Previously noticed these tag file warnings/errors last year in #362, the workaround at that time was to pin to |
PR #412. One thing that I wonder is why the second one has a |
Hi @jhlegarreta , I am not clear on what these tags do, was there documentation that helped you or could you briefly summarize what you found? |
They serve to create the index: https://examples.itk.org/genindex.html For the case at issue, it |
It seems we should rebase after @jhlegarreta 's related patches are in, check to see if the warnings actually cause issues in the generated documentation, ignore them if not, and keep #362 open to track the issue. |
Rebasing on |
Note: This is intentionally not updated to the ITK source code version so we can bump the source version separately.
It's a CMake warning that is making the ubuntu-22.04 documentation check fail: I thought we had fixed this one. And some other Doxygen warnings: |
Does not look like we fixed properly in other places either: InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK#3846
Not sure what the problem is with
Maybe the warnings in the GHA builds need attention. A quick look did not result in meaningful insight about the errors. |
Some further comments:
I've already run out of ideas Matt. |
…ageFilter Hopefully this will help with the Doxygen XML issues discussed at: InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKSphinxExamples#411.
@jhlegarreta thanks for diving in here!
Based on this evaluation / observation, I noticed an difference in AddImageFilter, PowImageFilter vs the Nary, Ternary, Weighted AddImageFilters that is removed here: InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK#4208 Crossing fingers that addresses these issues 🤞 . |
…ageFilter Hopefully this will help with the Doxygen XML issues discussed at: InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKSphinxExamples#411.
Note: This is intentionally not updated to the ITK source code version so we can bump the source version separately.