Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Bandaids for busted tests #133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2020
Merged

Bandaids for busted tests #133

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2020

Conversation

timholy
Copy link
Collaborator

@timholy timholy commented Nov 15, 2020

Hopefully this will get the package passing tests. This may not be a real fix, but my guess is that what happened is that with changes in the Julia version, the random numbers change their values. Generally I find it better to construct deterministic tests, but I don't have the time to figure out all the stuff I'd need to do for that; perhaps those that use the ICA & PPCA functionality can do so at a later time.

@timholy timholy merged commit d909d36 into master Nov 15, 2020
@timholy timholy deleted the teh/tests branch November 15, 2020 20:28
@ararslan
Copy link
Member

We could also use StableRNGs for testing purposes. Though I think the solution here is fine as well.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants