Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

add design document to refactor port config logic #3

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Junchao-Mellanox
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# SONiC Port Configuration Refactor Design #
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the changing design part is OK, suggest adding a test plan section

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added test plan part, please review

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
# SONiC Port Configuration Refactor Design #

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sonic-net/sonic-platform-common#72 check this PR, not quite sure whether it's already covered some change?

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand that PR, it said it support platform.json, but I don't see any code parse platform.json

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

then we ignor, I just thought maybe the also made some change.

@Junchao-Mellanox
Copy link
Owner Author

Community PR: sonic-net#613

Junchao-Mellanox pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
Added breakout handling section.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants