Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Add Object#deep_send #94

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 26, 2020
Merged

Add Object#deep_send #94

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 26, 2020

Conversation

Fryguy
Copy link
Member

@Fryguy Fryguy commented Oct 21, 2020

@chessbyte
Copy link
Member

Here are the callers of deep_send

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Oct 21, 2020

Checked commits Fryguy/more_core_extensions@c8a3dc0~...e61faef with ruby 2.6.3, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.28.0, and yamllint
3 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

@bdunne
Copy link
Member

bdunne commented Oct 21, 2020

Generally 👍

My only question is... From a more_core_extensions perspective, should we clean up the interface a bit before releasing the next version (this PR or another PR)? The method has a wide array of acceptable arguments (dotted string, multiple strings, multiple symbols, array).

@Fryguy
Copy link
Member Author

Fryguy commented Oct 21, 2020

I'm fine with it as is, personally.

@bdunne bdunne merged commit 9f7c109 into ManageIQ:master Oct 26, 2020
@Fryguy Fryguy deleted the deep_send branch October 27, 2020 14:55
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants