Instrument: full name needed, e.g. Bruker doesn't appear anywhere

[sneumann]

No description provided.

[schymane]

To be read from the settings file

[sneumann]

Which should have priority ? *.library or the settings ? If the former, this will require
single-instrument *.library files.

[uchem-massbank]

Won’t the latter (overwriting with the settings) require single-instrument library files?
I find the decision to overwrite this with the settings file a bit dangerous if the library files are indeed mixed.
But, if they are mixed, other settings will also presumably be wrong?
Are there consistent entries in the *.library file that can be converted to the correct instrument type in MassBank?

From: sneumann [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 19. November 2014 09:18
To: MassBank/MassBank2NIST
Subject: Re: [MassBank2NIST] Instrument: full name needed, e.g. Bruker doesn't appear anywhere (#8)

Which should have priority ? *.library or the settings ? If the former, this will require
single-instrument *.library files.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/8#issuecomment-63605760.