Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

ci: Bump Release qualification 0dt checks timeout too #31103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2025

Conversation

def-
Copy link
Contributor

@def- def- commented Jan 17, 2025

Seen failing in https://buildkite.com/materialize/release-qualification/builds/719#01947235-b61a-4862-ab56-bbf3580f1284

Green run: https://buildkite.com/materialize/release-qualification/builds/720

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@def- def- requested a review from ggevay January 17, 2025 22:43
@def- def- requested a review from a team as a code owner January 17, 2025 22:43
@def- def- enabled auto-merge January 17, 2025 23:18
Copy link
Contributor

@ggevay ggevay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thx!

@def- def- merged commit 1560fe1 into MaterializeInc:main Jan 18, 2025
81 checks passed
@def- def- deleted the pr-ci-rq-bump branch January 18, 2025 09:18
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants