Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
#

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

#

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

MetOffice / stylist Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 10
Star 26

Code
Issues 17
Pull requests
Discussions
Actions
Projects
Wiki
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Discussions
Actions
Projects
Wiki
Security
Insights

Teach the missing implicit rule about procedure pointers#100

Merged

astroDimitrios merged 3 commits intoMetOffice:masterMetOffice/stylist:masterfrom MatthewHambley:ProcPointIntentMatthewHambley/stylist:ProcPointIntentCopy head branch name to clipboard

Apr 20, 2023

+64-4

Conversation Commits3 (3)Checks Files changed

Commits

Commits on Jan 26, 2023

Implemented test to reveal bug
MatthewHambley
committed
Missing intent now understands procedure pointers
MatthewHambley
committed
Style fixes
MatthewHambley
committed

Footer

© 2025 GitHub, Inc.

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.