Skip to content

[Dev-Docs AI Improvement]: Build with Teams AI library #13028

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2025

Conversation

docsautomation[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This PR updates the content of the file: msteams-platform/bots/how-to/teams-conversational-ai/how-conversation-ai-get-started.md.

Submitted by: @Harsh-Chaturvedi-1

…rsation-ai-get-started.md by Harsh-Chaturvedi-1
@acrolinxatmsft1
Copy link
Collaborator

Acrolinx Scorecards

We currently enforce a minimum score of 80.

Click the scorecard links for each article to review the Acrolinx feedback on grammar, spelling, punctuation, writing style, and terminology:

Article Score Issues Scorecard Processed
msteams-platform/bots/how-to/teams-conversational-ai/how-conversation-ai-get-started.md 86 63 link

More info about Acrolinx

Use the Acrolinx extension, or sidebar, in Visual Studio Code to check spelling, grammar, style, tone, clarity, and key terminology when you're creating or updating content. For more information, see Use the Visual Studio Code extension to run Acrolinx locally.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 2fb3b47:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
msteams-platform/bots/how-to/teams-conversational-ai/how-conversation-ai-get-started.md ✅Succeeded View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@surbhigupta12 surbhigupta12 merged commit e697e65 into main Jun 24, 2025
3 checks passed
@surbhigupta12 surbhigupta12 deleted the update/ai-doc-content-1749643007613 branch June 24, 2025 04:02
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants