Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

feat: Added flexibility to either read "Up", "UP" or "uP" on the table data parser #1191

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

pesap
Copy link
Member

@pesap pesap commented Sep 12, 2024

Closes #1190

@pesap pesap requested a review from jd-lara September 12, 2024 19:38
@pesap pesap self-assigned this Sep 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.64%. Comparing base (3ce7468) to head (e704697).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1191   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.64%   84.64%           
=======================================
  Files         180      180           
  Lines        8256     8256           
=======================================
  Hits         6988     6988           
  Misses       1268     1268           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 84.64% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/parsers/power_system_table_data.jl 82.36% <100.00%> (ø)

@jd-lara jd-lara merged commit 0515d58 into main Sep 16, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TableDataParser: Enum Specification Naming Bug
2 participants