Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Add FullOuter support to GpuShuffledSymmetricHashJoinExec #10272

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

jlowe
Copy link
Contributor

@jlowe jlowe commented Jan 24, 2024

Closes #9442. Adds support for full outer joins to GpuShuffledSymmetricHashJoinExec. As with inner joins, this was measured to be around 50% faster that the existing GpuShuffledHashJoinExec logic on my machine where the left side is only 10 rows and the right side is 2 billion rows and there's only 2 shuffle partitions.

Signed-off-by: Jason Lowe <jlowe@nvidia.com>
@jlowe jlowe self-assigned this Jan 24, 2024
@jlowe
Copy link
Contributor Author

jlowe commented Jan 24, 2024

build

1 similar comment
@jlowe
Copy link
Contributor Author

jlowe commented Jan 25, 2024

build

Copy link
Collaborator

@abellina abellina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly minor stuff, it's looking mostly good

@jlowe
Copy link
Contributor Author

jlowe commented Jan 26, 2024

build

@sameerz sameerz added the performance A performance related task/issue label Jan 26, 2024
@jlowe
Copy link
Contributor Author

jlowe commented Jan 26, 2024

build

@sameerz
Copy link
Collaborator

sameerz commented Jan 27, 2024

build

@jlowe jlowe merged commit 1fb6361 into NVIDIA:branch-24.02 Jan 29, 2024
40 checks passed
@jlowe jlowe deleted the gpufulljoin branch January 29, 2024 14:38
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
performance A performance related task/issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEA] For hash joins where the build side can change use the smaller table for the build side
4 participants