invidious: move to by-name

[GaetanLepage]

Things done

Changelog: https://github.com/iv-org/invidious/releases/tag/v2.20241110.0

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[GaetanLepage]

This line is failing since the move to by-name.

[ncfavier]

This PR currently only has the move to by-name and not the actual update, right?

[GaetanLepage]

This PR currently only has the move to by-name and not the actual update, right?

Yes exactly, I am stuck on adapting the script after this change.
Basically, nix-prefetch does not seem to work with the new location of the invidious package derivation.

[ncfavier]

The nix-prefetch error seems to be unrelated to the by-name move; instead bisection points to #354367.

In the meantime, I suggest replacing the nix-prefetch call with

nix-prefetch fetchFromGitHub --owner iv-org --repo invidious --rev "$new_tag"

After that invidious updates successfully but the checkPhase fails.

[pbsds]

rather than block with a by-name migration, there is #355279 which is nearly ready to go