Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Bugfix get_nameid_unspecified and friends (refs #52) #55

Conversation

mjholtkamp
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like these methods are called with extra
arguments (e.g. sp_entityid), which are not used
in these specific methods.

Of course, Python complains if they are passed.
By allowing any kwargs, these are silently
ignored (as I believe they should, since they
are not relevant).

I only encountered the problem for
get_nameid_unspecified, but I noticed some other
methods that might have the same problem so I
changed them as well.

It looks like these methods are called with extra
arguments (e.g. sp_entityid), which are not used
in these specific methods.

Of course, Python complains if they are passed.
By allowing any kwargs, these are silently
ignored (as I believe they should, since they
are not relevant).

I only encountered the problem for 
get_nameid_unspecified, but I noticed some other
methods that might have the same problem so I
changed them as well.
@mjholtkamp mjholtkamp force-pushed the feature/bugfix-get_nameid_unspecified branch from 55d461e to d8df54c Compare February 3, 2020 14:07
@mhindery mhindery merged commit bd5d6a6 into OTA-Insight:master Feb 3, 2020
@mjholtkamp mjholtkamp deleted the feature/bugfix-get_nameid_unspecified branch February 4, 2020 08:29
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants