This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 18, 2023. It is now read-only.
Package Signing #4
Comments
jmariondev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 3, 2017
I was going to implement gnupg, but the python bindings for it are GPL licensed. I need to find an appropriately-licensed alternative. This verify method does no actual verification. Related #4
jmariondev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 3, 2017
I was going to implement gnupg, but the python bindings for it are GPL licensed. I need to find an appropriately-licensed alternative. This verify method does no actual verification. Related #4
jmariondev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 3, 2017
I was going to implement gnupg, but the python bindings for it are GPL licensed. I need to find an appropriately-licensed alternative. This verify method does no actual verification. Related #4
jmariondev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2017
I was going to implement gnupg, but the python bindings for it are GPL licensed. I need to find an appropriately-licensed alternative. This verify method does no actual verification. Related #4
jmariondev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2017
I was going to implement gnupg, but the python bindings for it are GPL licensed. I need to find an appropriately-licensed alternative. This verify method does no actual verification. Related #4
|
Signify in Python has been implemented: python-signify I changed the docs to remove reference to GPG in f062484. |
# for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
#.
After looking at implementing the gnupg PyPI package, I realized it is licensed under the GPL 🤢.
Instead of trying to find an appropriately-licensed gpg binding package, I may just write bindings to OpenBSD's signify and use those instead. Our use case is aligned with theirs (we only need simple verification, nothing more) so they are a good candidate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: