You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Remove for MVP1 the default product code (GTIN) in product creation, this is nice for a sandbox but dangerous for the production environment
Error messages for missing mandatory fields not good enough. Please add what mandatory field is missing e.g. if product code is empty, write product code missing. If brand/invented name is missing, write brand/invented name is missing....
Name of Medicinal Product is not mandatory field in product creation, but has to. This is the differentiation!
A brand name is valid for >10 products, maybe even 100 products. The name of the medicinal product is unique.
I also noticed that the brand/invented name is shown when you select a GTIN for a batch. But in real live we’d see that brand/invented name > 10 times for different GTIN’s and have to select the product based on the GTIN, because the brand name is same.... I think we can keep it for the MVP1, but it is not ideal. Later, the batches are created using the interface - then we don’t care about this anymore
Brand/Invented name cannot be changed - what if we have entered something wrong? This needs to be maintainable. Risk too high if not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
-Remove for MVP1 the default product code (GTIN)
-Error messages for missing mandatory fields not good enough.
-Name of Medicinal Product is not mandatory field in product creation, but has to
-Brand/Invented name cannot be changed but has to
Mandatory for MVP1:
A brand name is valid for >10 products, maybe even 100 products. The name of the medicinal product is unique.
I also noticed that the brand/invented name is shown when you select a GTIN for a batch. But in real live we’d see that brand/invented name > 10 times for different GTIN’s and have to select the product based on the GTIN, because the brand name is same.... I think we can keep it for the MVP1, but it is not ideal. Later, the batches are created using the interface - then we don’t care about this anymore
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: