New Components - dust #14043
New Components - dust #14043
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new functionalities to the Dust platform, including actions for interacting with an assistant and upserting documents. The main application module is enhanced with new properties and methods for API interactions, while the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Actions - Talk to Assistant - Upsert Document
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
components/dust/package.json (1)
Line range hint
1-18: Summary of package.json changes and next stepsThe changes to
package.jsonare appropriate for setting up the new Dust components:
- Version bump reflects the addition of new features.
- JSON structure has been corrected.
- Core Pipedream platform dependency has been added.
To complete the review process:
- Verify if any Dust-specific dependencies need to be added.
- Review the implementation files for the new
talk-assistantandupload-documentactions to ensure they meet the requirements outlined in the PR objectives.- Check for any additional configuration or setup files that might be necessary for integrating the Dust platform.
components/dust/actions/upsert-document/upsert-document.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM with a minor suggestion for improvement.The import statement and action definition look good. The key, name, description, version, and type are all appropriately set. It's great that you've included a link to the API documentation in the description.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what "upsert" means in the description, as it might not be a familiar term to all users. For example:
- description: "Upsert a document to a chosen Dust data source. [See the documentation](https://docs.dust.tt/reference/post_api-v1-w-wid-data-sources-name-documents-documentid)", + description: "Upsert (update or insert) a document to a chosen Dust data source. This action will create a new document if it doesn't exist, or update it if it does. [See the documentation](https://docs.dust.tt/reference/post_api-v1-w-wid-data-sources-name-documents-documentid)",components/dust/actions/talk-assistant/talk-assistant.mjs (1)
4-9: LGTM: Action definition is well-structured.The action definition is clear and aligns with the PR objectives. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is helpful.
Consider implementing a versioning strategy for future updates. For example, you might want to use semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH) for easier tracking of changes and compatibility.
components/dust/dust.app.mjs (3)
32-33: Handle Undefined Descriptions in Data SourcesWhen generating labels for Data Sources, if
descriptionis undefined, it may result in labels like"Data Source Name - undefined". Consider providing a default description.Apply this change to handle undefined descriptions:
label: `${name} - ${description}`, + label: `${name} - ${description || "No description available"}`,
17-18: Handle Undefined Descriptions in AssistantsSimilarly, when generating labels for Assistants, ensure that undefined
descriptionvalues are handled gracefully.Apply this change:
label: `${name} - ${description}`, + label: `${name} - ${description || "No description available"}`,
44-46: Consider Caching the Base URLIf the workspace ID doesn't change frequently, you might consider caching the base URL to avoid reconstructing it on every request.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (5)
- components/dust/actions/talk-assistant/talk-assistant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/dust/actions/upsert-document/upsert-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/dust/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/dust/dust.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/dust/package.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/dust/common/constants.mjs
Additional comments not posted (9)
components/dust/package.json (3)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate for adding new components, following semantic versioning principles.
14-14: Formatting fix approved.The addition of the closing brace for the
publishConfigsection corrects the JSON structure, ensuring proper formatting.
15-17: Dependency addition approved, but consider Dust-specific dependencies.The addition of
@pipedream/platformas a dependency is appropriate. However, given that this PR is about integrating new Dust components, consider if any Dust-specific libraries or SDKs need to be added as dependencies to support the newtalk-assistantandupload-documentactions.To verify if any Dust-specific dependencies are needed, please run the following script:
components/dust/actions/upsert-document/upsert-document.mjs (1)
1-49: Verify implementation of "talk-assistant" actionThe PR objectives mentioned two actions: "talk-assistant" and "upload-document". While this file implements document upload/upsert functionality, there's no implementation of the "talk-assistant" action visible here.
Please confirm that the "talk-assistant" action has been implemented in another file. If it hasn't been implemented yet, please ensure that it's added to complete the PR objectives.
To verify the existence of the "talk-assistant" action, you can run the following script:
If the script doesn't find any matching files, it may indicate that the "talk-assistant" action is missing and needs to be implemented to fully meet the PR objectives.
components/dust/actions/talk-assistant/talk-assistant.mjs (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate.The imports for TIMEZONE_OPTIONS and the dust app are correctly defined and relevant to the action's functionality.
1-76: Overall assessment: Well-implemented talk-assistant action.The implementation of the talk-assistant action is thorough and aligns well with the PR objectives. It correctly handles sending messages to the Dust platform and processing the responses. The code is well-structured and includes necessary details such as documentation links and appropriate prop definitions.
Minor suggestions for improvements include:
- Implementing a versioning strategy for future updates.
- Adding input validation for username and email props.
- Enhancing error handling and response validation in the run method.
These suggestions, while not critical, would further improve the robustness and maintainability of the code.
components/dust/dust.app.mjs (3)
81-87: EnsuredocumentIdis Properly Defined inupsertDocumentIn the
upsertDocumentmethod,documentIdis used in the URL path. Ensure that when calling this method,documentIdis provided and correctly defined to avoid issues with the API request.
75-76: Verify the API Endpoint forsendMessageToAssistantPlease confirm that the path
"/assistant/conversations"is the correct endpoint for sending messages to an assistant. According to the Dust API documentation, the endpoint might differ.Run the following script to verify the endpoint:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct API endpoint for sending messages to an assistant. # Test: Check if the endpoint is valid by making a HEAD request. curl -I -H "Authorization: Bearer $DUST_API_KEY" "https://dust.tt/api/v1/w/$WORKSPACE_ID/assistant/conversations"Replace
$DUST_API_KEYand$WORKSPACE_IDwith your actual API key and workspace ID.
30-31: Verify the Correct Property NamedustAPIDataSourceIdIn the
dataSourceIdoptions mapping, you're usingdustAPIDataSourceIdas the value. Please verify thatdustAPIDataSourceIdis the correct property for the Data Source ID returned by the API. It might besId, similar to how it's used inassistantId.Run the following script to confirm the property name:
Replace
$DUST_API_KEYand$WORKSPACE_IDwith your actual API key and workspace ID.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (3)
- components/dust/actions/talk-assistant/talk-assistant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/dust/actions/upsert-document/upsert-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/dust/dust.app.mjs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- components/dust/actions/talk-assistant/talk-assistant.mjs
- components/dust/actions/upsert-document/upsert-document.mjs
Additional comments not posted (9)
components/dust/dust.app.mjs (9)
1-6: LGTM: Import and app declaration look goodThe import statement and app declaration are correct and align with the PR objectives for integrating the Dust platform components.
7-21: LGTM:assistantIdproperty definition is well-implementedThe
assistantIdproperty definition is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR objective for the "talk-assistant" action. The description clearly states the requirements for the assistant type, and the options method correctly fetches and formats the assistant configurations from the Dust API.
39-41: LGTM:_baseUrlmethod is correctly implementedThe
_baseUrlmethod correctly constructs the base URL for API requests using theworkspace_idfrom the authentication object.
42-46: LGTM:_headersmethod is correctly implementedThe
_headersmethod correctly constructs the headers for API requests, including the Authorization header with the API key.
56-61: LGTM:listAssistantsmethod is correctly implementedThe
listAssistantsmethod correctly uses the_makeRequestutility to fetch assistant configurations. This implementation aligns with the PR objectives for interacting with assistants.
62-67: LGTM:listDataSourcesmethod is correctly implementedThe
listDataSourcesmethod correctly uses the_makeRequestutility to fetch data sources. This implementation aligns with the PR objectives for interacting with data sources.
68-85: LGTM:sendMessageToAssistantandupsertDocumentmethods are correctly implementedBoth
sendMessageToAssistantandupsertDocumentmethods correctly use the_makeRequestutility for their respective operations. These implementations align with the PR objectives for the "talk-assistant" and "upload-document" actions. TheupsertDocumentmethod properly uses thedataSourceIdanddocumentIdin the request path.
1-85: Overall assessment: Good implementation with minor improvements neededThe
dust.app.mjsfile successfully implements the required components for interacting with the Dust platform, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code structure is clear and follows good practices. To further improve the implementation, please address the following points:
- Update the label and description for the
dataSourceIdproperty to be consistent with Dust platform terminology.- Add a default empty array when destructuring
data_sourcesin thedataSourceIdoptions method.- Implement error handling in the
_makeRequestmethod to improve robustness.Once these minor improvements are made, the implementation will be more robust and clear, providing a solid foundation for interacting with the Dust platform.
47-55:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling to
_makeRequestmethodTo improve the robustness of the
_makeRequestmethod, please add error handling. This will prevent unhandled promise rejections and provide better error reporting. Here's the suggested change:async _makeRequest({ $ = this, path, ...opts }) { - return axios($, { + try { + return await axios($, { url: this._baseUrl() + path, headers: this._headers(), ...opts, - }); + }); + } catch (error) { + $.error(`Request to ${path} failed: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },This change will catch any errors that occur during the request, log them, and then re-throw the error for proper handling by the caller.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
🤯 |
Resolves #14021.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Version Update