GitHub app actions improvements #14058
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (14)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (14)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
…m/PipedreamHQ/pipedream into 13927-github-actions-improvements
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
components/github/actions/get-repository/get-repository.mjs (2)
5-7: Metadata updates look good, with a minor suggestion.The changes to the action's name, description, and version are clear improvements:
- The new name "Get Repository Info" is more descriptive.
- The updated description provides better clarity.
- The version increment follows semantic versioning.
Consider updating the documentation link to use markdown link syntax for consistency:
- description: "Get information for a specific repository. [See the documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/repos/repos#get-a-repository)", + description: "Get information for a specific repository. [See the documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/repos/repos#get-a-repository)",
24-24: Improved success message, with a suggestion.The inclusion of
repoFullnamein the success message provides more detailed feedback, which is great.For even more clarity, consider specifying that it's the repository's full name:
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved repository ${repoFullname}`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved repository information for ${repoFullname}`);This change would make the message more explicit about what was retrieved.
components/github/actions/search-issues-and-pull-requests/search-issues-and-pull-requests.mjs (2)
7-7: Version bump to 0.2.0 is appropriate.The version update from 0.1.16 to 0.2.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features and improvements in this PR.
Consider updating or creating a CHANGELOG.md file to document the changes introduced in this version.
11-17: Excellent addition of infoBox with example query.The new infoBox property significantly enhances user experience by providing a clear, practical example of how to use the search functionality. This addition aligns well with the PR objective of improving usability for GitHub actions.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what each part of the example query does. For instance:
content: `Example query: \`bug report in:title type:issue repo:octocat/Hello-World\` This will return issues in the repository [octocat/Hello-World](https://github.com/octocat/Hello-World) with the title including the words "bug report". Query breakdown: - \`bug report\`: Search for these words in the title - \`in:title\`: Limit the search to the title field - \`type:issue\`: Only search for issues (not pull requests) - \`repo:octocat/Hello-World\`: Limit the search to this specific repository`,This additional explanation would further improve user understanding of how to construct effective queries.
components/github/actions/update-gist/update-gist.mjs (1)
13-17: LGTM: InfoAlert addition enhances user experience.The new infoAlert property is a great addition, providing important information about file handling in a more prominent and user-friendly way. This change improves the overall usability of the action.
Consider adding a period at the end of the alert content for consistency with other text in the file:
- content: "Files from the previous version of the gist that aren't explicitly changed during an edit are unchanged. At least one of description or files is required.", + content: "Files from the previous version of the gist that aren't explicitly changed during an edit are unchanged. At least one of description or files is required.",components/github/actions/common/asyncProps.mjs (2)
28-43: Consider usingparseIntfor explicit number conversionThe
milestoneNumberproperty looks well-structured. However, the use of the unary plus operator (+item.number) to convert the milestone number to an integer, while valid, might not be immediately clear to all developers.For better readability and explicit intent, consider using
parseInt()instead. This would make the type conversion more obvious:return items.map((item) => ({ label: item.title, - value: +item.number, + value: parseInt(item.number, 10), }));This change makes the intention to convert to an integer more explicit and guards against potential issues if
item.numberis not a string representation of an integer.
44-59: Review pagination implementation and consider adding 'optional' fieldThe
pullNumberproperty is well-structured, but there are two points to consider:
Pagination implementation:
The current implementation increments the page number by 1 (page: page + 1). This assumes that thepageparameter is zero-indexed, while the API expects a one-indexed page number. If this assumption is correct, it's a good practice, but it might be worth adding a comment to explain this.Missing 'optional' field:
Unlike the other properties in this object,pullNumberdoesn't have anoptionalfield. Is this intentional? If pull numbers are always required, this is fine, but if they can be optional in some contexts, consider addingoptional: truefor consistency with other properties.Consider the following changes:
pullNumber: { type: "integer", label: "Pull Request Number", description: "The pull request to get reviewers for", + optional: true, // Add this if pull numbers can be optional options: async ({ page }) => { const prs = await this.github.getRepositoryPullRequests({ + // Add 1 to convert from zero-indexed to one-indexed page number page: page + 1, repoFullname: this.repoFullname, }); return prs.map((pr) => ({ label: pr.title, value: parseInt(pr.number, 10), // Use parseInt for consistency with earlier suggestion })); }, },These changes improve consistency and clarity in the code.
components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs (2)
5-7: Approved changes with a minor suggestion.The updates to the action name, description, and version are good improvements:
- The capitalized name enhances readability.
- The added documentation link provides valuable reference.
- The version increment to 0.1.0 appropriately reflects the changes.
Consider adding a brief changelog in the GitHub repository to document the changes that led to the version increment from 0.0.13 to 0.1.0. This will help users understand what's new or improved in this version.
48-51: Approved: Excellent refactoring of therunmethod.The changes to the
runmethod are a significant improvement:
- Destructuring
thiscontext simplifies the function call.- Passing a single object to
createOrUpdateFileContentenhances readability and maintainability.- This approach makes it easier to add or remove parameters in the future.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the destructuring and object passing approach. This will help future maintainers quickly understand the rationale behind this pattern. For example:
// Destructure context and pass all props as a single object for flexibility const { github, ...data } = this;components/github/actions/list-gists-for-a-user/list-gists-for-a-user.mjs (1)
22-32: Dynamic property generation improves usabilityThe addition of the
additionalProps()method is an excellent improvement:
- It dynamically sets the default
usernameto the authenticated user's login, which enhances usability for the most common use case.- The property remains configurable, maintaining flexibility for users who need to specify a different username.
This change significantly improves the user experience of the action.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
additionalProps()method, as it's a somewhat advanced feature that might not be immediately clear to all developers maintaining this code in the future. For example:// Dynamically generate additional properties, setting the default username // to the authenticated user's login for improved usability async additionalProps() { // ... (existing code) }components/github/actions/get-repository-content/get-repository-content.mjs (1)
26-43: Enhanced 'mediaType' parameter with options and documentation.The 'mediaType' parameter has been significantly improved:
- The description now includes a link to the documentation, which is helpful for users seeking more information.
- Specific options for different media types have been added, providing clear choices and enhancing the action's flexibility.
The structure and formatting of the options are consistent and clear.
Consider adding a default value for the 'mediaType' parameter to make it clear which option is used if not specified. For example:
mediaType: { label: "Media Type", description: "The media type of the response. [See the documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/repos/contents?apiVersion=2022-11-28#get-repository-content) for more information.", type: "string", + default: "application/vnd.github.object+json", options: [ // ... (options remain unchanged) ], optional: true, },components/github/actions/get-reviewers/get-reviewers.mjs (4)
19-27: Approved: New prOrCommit property enhances flexibilityThe introduction of the
prOrCommitproperty is a good improvement, allowing users to choose between PR and commit SHA. This change simplifies the interface and increases the action's versatility.Consider adding a default value to the
prOrCommitproperty to make it clear which option is selected by default. For example:prOrCommit: { type: "string", label: "PR or Commit", description: "Whether to get reviewers for a [pull request](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/pulls/reviews#list-reviews-for-a-pull-request) or a [commit SHA](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/commits/commits#list-pull-requests-associated-with-a-commit).", options: [ "Pull Request", "Commit SHA", ], reloadProps: true, + default: "Pull Request", },
37-49: Approved: Dynamic property loading with additionalPropsThe
additionalPropsmethod effectively implements dynamic property loading based on the user's selection inprOrCommit. This approach enhances the action's flexibility and user experience.Consider extracting the
commitShaproperty definition to a separate constant or object to improve maintainability. For example:const COMMIT_SHA_PROP = { type: "string", label: "Commit SHA", description: "A commit SHA to get reviewers for", }; async additionalProps() { return this.prOrCommit === "Pull Request" ? { pullNumber: asyncProps.pullNumber } : { commitSha: COMMIT_SHA_PROP }; }This change would make it easier to maintain and potentially reuse the
commitShaproperty definition.
95-95: LGTM: Minor update to export summaryThe change in the export summary message improves consistency.
Consider refactoring the
runmethod to leverage the newprOrCommitproperty. This could simplify the logic and make it more aligned with the new property structure. For example:async run({ $ }) { let pullNumber; if (this.prOrCommit === "Commit SHA") { const pr = await this.github.getPullRequestForCommit({ repoFullname: this.repoFullname, sha: this.commitSha, }); if (!pr?.number) { $.export("$summary", "No PR associated with this commit"); return; } pullNumber = pr.number; } else { pullNumber = this.pullNumber; } const reviews = await this.github.getReviewsForPullRequest({ repoFullname: this.repoFullname, pullNumber, }); const reviewers = this.getReviewers(reviews); $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved reviewers"); return reviewers; }This refactoring would make the
runmethod more consistent with the new property structure and potentially easier to maintain.
Line range hint
1-98: Overall: Excellent improvements to action usability and flexibilityThe changes in this file significantly enhance the GitHub "Get Reviewers" action, aligning well with the PR objectives of improving GitHub app actions. Key improvements include:
- Introduction of the
prOrCommitproperty, allowing users to choose between PR and commit SHA.- Dynamic property loading with
additionalProps, enhancing flexibility.- Improved documentation with direct links to GitHub docs.
- Version bump reflecting the new features.
These changes make the action more user-friendly and versatile, while maintaining its core functionality. The refactoring suggestions provided in previous comments could further improve code maintainability and clarity.
To further enhance this action, consider the following architectural improvements:
- Error handling: Add more robust error handling, especially for API calls and user input validation.
- Logging: Implement more detailed logging to aid in debugging and monitoring.
- Testing: Ensure that unit tests are updated or added to cover the new functionality, particularly the dynamic property loading.
- Performance: If this action is used frequently, consider implementing caching mechanisms for API calls to reduce load on GitHub's servers and improve response times.
These suggestions aim to improve the overall robustness and maintainability of the action.
components/github/actions/create-pull-request/create-pull-request.mjs (1)
31-37: Improved clarity with headRepo prop renaming and description update.The changes to the
headRepoprop (formerlyhead) significantly improve clarity:
- Renaming from
headtoheadRepois more specific and reduces potential confusion with theheadbranch.- The new description clearly explains that this can be a different repository from the base, which is crucial information for users.
These updates align well with the PR objectives of improving usability.
Consider adding a brief example in the description to illustrate when one might use a different repository, e.g., "Useful for cross-repository pull requests."
components/github/actions/update-issue/update-issue.mjs (2)
12-12: Correct the typo and rephrase the description for clarity.There is a typo in "Gihub"; it should be "GitHub".
Also, the description says "Update a new issue", which is contradictory. It should be "Update an existing issue in a GitHub repository."
35-37: Remove unused variable instead of suppressing linter warning.The variable
infoBoxis not used in the function. Instead of suppressing the linter warning with// eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars, please removeinfoBoxfrom the destructuring assignment.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (48)
- components/github/actions/common/asyncProps.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/actions/create-branch/create-branch.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/github/actions/create-gist/create-gist.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/actions/create-issue-comment/create-issue-comment.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/actions/create-issue/create-issue.mjs (3 hunks)
- components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/github/actions/create-pull-request/create-pull-request.mjs (4 hunks)
- components/github/actions/create-repository/create-repository.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/actions/get-issue-assignees/get-issue-assignees.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/actions/get-repository-content/get-repository-content.mjs (3 hunks)
- components/github/actions/get-repository/get-repository.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/github/actions/get-reviewers/get-reviewers.mjs (4 hunks)
- components/github/actions/list-gists-for-a-user/list-gists-for-a-user.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/actions/list-releases/list-releases.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/actions/search-issues-and-pull-requests/search-issues-and-pull-requests.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/actions/update-gist/update-gist.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/actions/update-issue/update-issue.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/github/actions/update-project-v2-item-status/update-project-v2-item-status.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/github.app.mjs (7 hunks)
- components/github/package.json (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/common/common-flex.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/common/common-webhook.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/common/utils.mjs (0 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-branch/new-branch.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-card-in-column/new-card-in-column.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-collaborator/new-collaborator.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-commit-comment/new-commit-comment.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-commit/new-commit.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-discussion/new-discussion.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-fork/new-fork.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-gist/new-gist.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-issue-with-status/new-issue-with-status.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-label/new-label.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-mention/new-mention.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-notification/new-notification.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-or-updated-issue/new-or-updated-issue.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-or-updated-milestone/new-or-updated-milestone.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-or-updated-pull-request/new-or-updated-pull-request.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-organization/new-organization.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-release/new-release.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-repository/new-repository.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-review-request/new-review-request.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-security-alert/new-security-alert.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-star-by-user/new-star-by-user.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-star/new-star.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/new-team/new-team.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/github/sources/webhook-events/webhook-events.mjs (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- components/github/sources/common/utils.mjs
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (31)
- components/github/actions/create-branch/create-branch.mjs
- components/github/actions/create-gist/create-gist.mjs
- components/github/actions/create-issue-comment/create-issue-comment.mjs
- components/github/actions/create-repository/create-repository.mjs
- components/github/actions/get-issue-assignees/get-issue-assignees.mjs
- components/github/actions/list-releases/list-releases.mjs
- components/github/actions/update-project-v2-item-status/update-project-v2-item-status.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-branch/new-branch.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-card-in-column/new-card-in-column.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-collaborator/new-collaborator.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-commit-comment/new-commit-comment.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-commit/new-commit.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-discussion/new-discussion.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-fork/new-fork.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-gist/new-gist.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-issue-with-status/new-issue-with-status.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-label/new-label.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-mention/new-mention.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-notification/new-notification.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-or-updated-issue/new-or-updated-issue.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-or-updated-milestone/new-or-updated-milestone.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-or-updated-pull-request/new-or-updated-pull-request.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-organization/new-organization.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-release/new-release.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-repository/new-repository.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-review-request/new-review-request.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-security-alert/new-security-alert.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-star-by-user/new-star-by-user.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-star/new-star.mjs
- components/github/sources/new-team/new-team.mjs
- components/github/sources/webhook-events/webhook-events.mjs
Additional context used
Biome
components/github/actions/list-gists-for-a-user/list-gists-for-a-user.mjs
[error] 40-40: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
Additional comments not posted (49)
components/github/actions/get-repository/get-repository.mjs (2)
19-19: Good use of destructuring.The destructuring of
repoFullnamefromthisis a good practice. It simplifies the code and makes it more readable by avoiding repeatedthis.repoFullnamereferences.
21-21: Proper use of object shorthand syntax.The use of shorthand syntax for the
repoFullnameproperty in the object passed tothis.github.getRepo()is consistent with the earlier destructuring and follows modern JavaScript practices.components/github/actions/search-issues-and-pull-requests/search-issues-and-pull-requests.mjs (4)
6-6: Improved description with documentation link.The updated description now includes a direct link to the relevant documentation. This change enhances usability by providing users with easy access to detailed information about searching issues and pull requests.
20-20: Enhanced query property description with documentation link.The updated description for the query property now includes a reference to the documentation, providing users with access to more detailed information and examples. This change improves usability by offering comprehensive guidance on constructing effective queries.
Line range hint
1-40: Overall, excellent improvements to usability and functionality.The changes made to this file significantly enhance the usability and functionality of the GitHub action for searching issues and pull requests. Key improvements include:
- Better documentation with direct links to relevant resources.
- Addition of an informative example query in the infoBox.
- Clearer descriptions for properties.
- Enhanced user feedback through the addition of a summary export.
These changes align perfectly with the PR objectives of improving the usability of GitHub actions. The version bump to 0.2.0 accurately reflects the nature of these enhancements.
25-25: Improved run method and maxResults description.The changes to the run method and maxResults description enhance user feedback and clarity:
- The addition of the summary export provides useful feedback on the number of items fetched.
- The maxResults description has been refined for better clarity.
- The run method signature has been updated to accept a destructured
{ $ }parameter.These changes align well with the PR objective of improving usability.
Could you please clarify the purpose and origin of the
{ $ }parameter in the run method? It would be helpful to understand how this change affects the action's invocation or its interaction with the GitHub API.To verify the usage of this parameter, let's run the following script:
Also applies to: 30-36
Verification successful
Verified uniqueness of the
{ $ }parameter in the run method.The search did not find any other instances of the
runmethod using the{ $ }parameter in the codebase, indicating that its usage is unique tosearch-issues-and-pull-requests.mjs.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of similar parameter usage rg --type javascript '\brun\s*\(\s*{\s*\$\s*}\s*\)' -g '!**/search-issues-and-pull-requests.mjs'Length of output: 223
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of similar parameter usage with corrected regex rg --type javascript '\brun\s*\(\s*\{\s*\$\s*\}\s*\)' -g '!**/search-issues-and-pull-requests.mjs'Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of similar parameter usage with corrected file type rg --type js '\brun\s*\(\s*\{\s*\$\s*\}\s*\)' -g '!**/search-issues-and-pull-requests.mjs'Length of output: 92
components/github/actions/update-gist/update-gist.mjs (3)
8-8: LGTM: Description update improves clarity.The simplified description focuses on the core functionality while preserving the link to the documentation. This change enhances readability without losing important information.
9-9: LGTM: Version bump is appropriate.The version increment from 0.0.6 to 0.0.7 correctly reflects the minor updates made to the component.
8-17: Overall improvements enhance action usability.The changes made to this file collectively improve the clarity and user-friendliness of the "Update Gist" action:
- The simplified description focuses on core functionality.
- The version bump correctly reflects the updates.
- The new infoAlert provides important details in a more prominent way.
These updates align well with the PR objectives of enhancing GitHub actions usability. The action is now more intuitive and informative for users.
components/github/actions/common/asyncProps.mjs (2)
1-60: Overall structure is good, with opportunities for improvementThe
asyncProps.mjsfile provides a well-structured module for handling asynchronous properties related to GitHub issues and pull requests. The properties (assignees, labels, milestoneNumber, and pullNumber) are consistently defined with appropriate metadata and asynchronous option fetching.Main points for improvement:
- Context binding: Ensure
this.githubandthis.repoFullnameare properly bound or injected when this object is used.- Code reuse: Consider refactoring common patterns in the property definitions to reduce duplication.
- Consistency: Ensure all properties have consistent fields (e.g., 'optional' field for pullNumber).
- Type conversion: Use consistent and explicit methods for converting string numbers to integers.
- Pagination: Add a comment explaining the page number adjustment in the pullNumber property.
Addressing these points will enhance the maintainability and clarity of the code.
2-14: Verify the context ofthis.githubandthis.repoFullnameThe
assigneesproperty looks well-structured, but there's a potential issue with the use ofthis.githubandthis.repoFullnamein theoptionsfunction. These properties are not defined within the current context of the exported object.Please ensure that these properties are correctly bound or injected when this object is used. Consider refactoring to pass these dependencies explicitly or use a factory function to create this object with the correct context.
components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs (3)
35-41: Excellent improvement to the branch property.The refactoring of the
branchproperty to use apropDefinitionstructure is a significant enhancement:
- It dynamically retrieves branch options based on the selected repository, improving user experience.
- This approach promotes reusability and maintainability.
- The implementation aligns with best practices for GitHub Actions.
43-43: Approved: Improved clarity in branch description.The updated description for the
branchproperty is more informative and accurate:
- It clearly states that the default is the repository's default branch.
- The mention of both 'main' and 'master' as possible default branches accounts for variations across repositories.
This change enhances user understanding and reduces potential confusion.
Line range hint
1-61: Summary: Excellent improvements to the GitHub ActionOverall, the changes made to this file significantly enhance the usability and maintainability of the "Create or Update File Contents" action:
- The action metadata (name, description, version) has been updated to improve clarity and provide better documentation.
- The
branchproperty now uses a dynamicpropDefinition, offering a more user-friendly experience.- The
runmethod has been refactored for better readability and future extensibility.These changes align well with the PR objectives of improving GitHub Actions usability. The code is clean, well-structured, and follows best practices. The minor suggestions provided (adding a changelog and a comment for the destructuring approach) would further enhance the maintainability of the code.
Great work on these improvements!
components/github/sources/common/common-webhook.mjs (1)
3-3: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The updated import path for
checkAdminPermissionlooks good. This change suggests a reorganization of the project structure, potentially centralizing common utilities. The functionality should remain the same.To ensure the new import path is correct, please run the following script:
This script will verify that the
utils.mjsfile exists in the new location and that it exports thecheckAdminPermissionfunction.Verification successful
Import path verified successfully.
The updated import path for
checkAdminPermissionis correct, ensuring proper functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the utils.mjs file and the checkAdminPermission function # Test 1: Check if the file exists if fd -p "components/github/common/utils.mjs"; then echo "utils.mjs file found in the expected location." else echo "Error: utils.mjs file not found in the expected location." exit 1 fi # Test 2: Check if the checkAdminPermission function is exported from utils.mjs if rg -q "export.*checkAdminPermission" "components/github/common/utils.mjs"; then echo "checkAdminPermission function found in utils.mjs" else echo "Error: checkAdminPermission function not found in utils.mjs" exit 1 fi echo "Verification completed successfully."Length of output: 444
components/github/actions/list-gists-for-a-user/list-gists-for-a-user.mjs (5)
1-1: Improved documentation and error handlingThe changes in these lines enhance the action's documentation and error handling capabilities:
- The addition of
ConfigurationErrorimport allows for more specific error handling.- The updated description now includes a link to the official documentation, which is helpful for users.
- The version number update to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the minor improvements made to the action.
These changes improve the overall quality and usability of the action.
Also applies to: 7-8
16-17: Improved clarity for the 'since' parameterThe updates to the
sinceproperty significantly improve its usability:
- The new label "Filter by Timestamp" is more descriptive and user-friendly.
- The expanded description provides clear guidance on the expected date format, including an example and a link to further documentation.
These changes will help users understand how to correctly use this parameter, potentially reducing errors and improving the overall user experience.
44-45: Standardized date format for API callThe addition of the
sincevariable, which converts the validated date to an ISO string, is a good practice:
- It ensures that the date is in the correct format for the GitHub API call.
- Standardizing the date format before making the API request helps prevent potential issues with date parsing on the API side.
This change improves the reliability of the action when dealing with date-based filtering.
48-48: Consistent use of validated date in API callThe update to use the
sincevariable in the API call is correct and consistent with the earlier changes:
- It ensures that a properly validated and formatted date is always used in the request.
- This change ties together the earlier input validation and date formatting, completing the improvement to date handling in this action.
This update enhances the overall reliability and consistency of the action.
11-13: Verify the impact of reloadPropsThe addition of
reloadProps: trueto thegithubprop is a good improvement. This ensures that the latest configuration is used when the action is executed.To ensure this change doesn't have any unintended side effects, please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of
reloadPropsin the codebase:This will help verify if this pattern is consistently applied across similar components.
Verification successful
reloadProps is consistently used across the codebase
The addition of
reloadProps: truein this file aligns with its usage in other components, ensuring consistent behavior.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of reloadProps in the codebase # Search for reloadProps in all JavaScript and TypeScript files rg --type js --type ts 'reloadProps'Length of output: 985
components/github/actions/get-repository-content/get-repository-content.mjs (6)
6-6: Improved description format and added documentation link.The description has been concisely reformatted into a single line, which improves readability. The addition of a link to the documentation is beneficial for users seeking more detailed information.
7-7: Version number updated appropriately.The version bump from "0.0.16" to "0.1.0" correctly reflects the addition of new features and improvements in this update. This change follows semantic versioning principles.
19-19: Improved 'path' parameter description.The description for the 'path' parameter has been effectively condensed into a single line. This change maintains clarity while improving consistency with other parameter descriptions in the file.
44-54: Excellent addition of 'branch' parameter.The new 'branch' parameter is a valuable addition to this action:
- It allows users to specify which branch to use, enhancing the action's flexibility.
- The use of
propDefinitionensures consistency with other GitHub-related actions.- The description clearly explains the parameter's purpose and default behavior.
This change significantly improves the action's usability, especially for repositories with multiple branches.
62-64: Correct implementation of 'branch' parameter in API call.The changes in the 'run' method properly implement the new 'branch' parameter:
- A 'params' object has been added to the GitHub API call.
- The 'branch' parameter is correctly included as 'ref' in the API request.
This ensures that the action uses the specified branch when retrieving repository content, consistent with the new parameter's functionality.
Line range hint
1-71: Overall excellent improvements to the GitHub action.The changes made to this action significantly enhance its functionality and usability:
- The description and documentation have been improved.
- The version number has been appropriately updated.
- The 'mediaType' parameter now includes clear options for different media types.
- A new 'branch' parameter has been added, allowing users to specify which branch to use.
- The implementation correctly incorporates these changes in the API call.
These modifications align well with the PR objectives of enhancing GitHub actions usability. The action is now more flexible and user-friendly, with clearer documentation and more granular control over the repository content retrieval process.
components/github/actions/get-reviewers/get-reviewers.mjs (2)
2-2: LGTM: New import for asyncPropsThe addition of the
asyncPropsimport is consistent with the introduction of dynamic property handling, which enhances the flexibility of the action.
8-9: Approved: Enhanced description and version updateThe description now includes helpful links to GitHub documentation, improving user understanding. The version bump to 0.1.0 accurately reflects the addition of new features.
components/github/actions/create-pull-request/create-pull-request.mjs (8)
7-8: Improved description and version update.The changes in the description and version are appropriate:
- The updated description now includes a link to the official documentation, which is helpful for users.
- The version increment from "0.0.9" to "0.1.0" correctly reflects the significant changes made to the action.
17-18: Improved clarity for repoFullname prop.The updates to the
repoFullnameprop enhance its clarity:
- The new label "Base Repository" is more specific and accurately describes the prop's purpose.
- The updated description provides clearer context, explaining that this is where the pull request will be created.
These changes will help users better understand the purpose of this prop when using the action.
29-29: Clearer description for base prop.The updated description for the
baseprop is an improvement:
- It clearly states that this is "where the changes will be received," which helps users understand the role of the base branch in the pull request process.
This change contributes to the overall goal of improving the action's usability.
39-48: Logical redefinition of head prop.The redefinition of the
headprop improves the overall structure and clarity of the action:
- It now clearly represents the head branch, which is more intuitive given the renaming of the previous 'head' prop to 'headRepo'.
- The description accurately explains the purpose of the head branch in the pull request process.
- The
propDefinitionnow correctly refers toc.headRepo, ensuring consistency with the earlier changes.These changes contribute to a more logical and easier-to-understand action interface.
52-52: Improved clarity in body, maintainerCanModify, and draft props.The updates to these props enhance the overall clarity of the action:
- The
bodyprop description is now more concise and straightforward.- The
maintainerCanModifylabel has been corrected to the plural form, "Maintainers Can Modify", which is grammatically more accurate.- The
draftprop description now includes a link to more detailed documentation about draft pull requests, which is helpful for users who may be unfamiliar with this feature.These changes contribute to better usability and understanding of the action's parameters.
Also applies to: 57-57, 64-65
70-70: Enhanced descriptions for title and issue props.The updates to the
titleandissueprops improve the action's documentation:
- The
titleprop description has been simplified, which is appropriate for this straightforward property.- The
issueprop description now provides more detailed information about how an issue is converted to a pull request. This additional context is valuable for users who might be using this feature.These changes align with the PR objectives of improving usability by providing clearer and more informative descriptions.
Also applies to: 83-84
91-91: Improved error message clarity.The simplified error message for the case when a title is missing and no issue is specified is an improvement:
- It's more concise while still providing clear guidance to the user.
- The message effectively explains both the error condition and the possible solutions (specifying a title or converting an existing issue).
This change contributes to better user experience by providing clearer feedback when input validation fails.
Line range hint
1-118: Overall assessment: Significant improvements in clarity and usability.This pull request successfully achieves its objectives of enhancing the usability of the GitHub Create Pull Request action. The changes include:
- More precise and informative property descriptions.
- Logical renaming and restructuring of properties (e.g.,
headtoheadRepo).- Updated version number reflecting the significant changes.
- Improved error messages for better user guidance.
These modifications collectively contribute to a more user-friendly and intuitive interface for the action. The changes are well-aligned with the goals outlined in the linked issue #13927 for improving the usability of GitHub actions.
components/github/sources/common/common-flex.mjs (2)
Line range hint
1-238: Overall impact of the import change is minimal and positive.The relocation of
checkAdminPermissionto a common utils file is the only change in this file. This modification:
- Improves code organization by centralizing common utilities.
- Potentially enhances maintainability by reducing duplication across the project.
- Has no negative impact on the existing functionality, as the usage of
checkAdminPermissionremains consistent throughout the file.This change aligns well with the PR objectives of improving usability and maintainability of GitHub actions.
3-4: LGTM: Import refactoring looks good.The change to import
checkAdminPermissionfrom a common utils file is a good practice for code organization and reusability. This refactoring aligns with the PR objectives of improving usability and maintainability of GitHub actions.Let's verify the usage of
checkAdminPermissionin the rest of the file:Verification successful
Verification Successful: All usages of
checkAdminPermissionare correctly updated to the new import path.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of checkAdminPermission in the file # Test: Search for checkAdminPermission usage rg --type javascript 'checkAdminPermission' components/github/sources/common/common-flex.mjsLength of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retry verifying the usage of checkAdminPermission in the file with corrected file type. # Test: Search for checkAdminPermission usage with the correct file type rg --type js 'checkAdminPermission' components/github/sources/common/common-flex.mjsLength of output: 273
components/github/actions/create-issue/create-issue.mjs (9)
9-9: Version update reflects new changesUpdating the version to
"0.3.0"appropriately signals the addition of new features and changes.
18-18: Enabled property reloading withreloadProps: trueAdding
reloadProps: trueensures that whenrepoFullnamechanges, the component reloads properties based on the new repository, which is necessary for dynamic permission checking.
27-27: Clarified description for the body propertyThe updated description for
bodyimproves clarity about its purpose.
32-34: Organized code by adding themethodsobjectIntroducing the
methodsobject withcheckPushPermissionenhances code organization and readability.
35-49: Conditional properties based on user permissionsThe
additionalPropsmethod correctly checks push permissions and conditionally returns properties. This ensures users without push access are informed appropriately.
52-54: DestructuredinfoBoxto prevent unintended API parametersBy extracting
infoBoxfromthis, you prevent it from being included in thedatasent to the GitHub API, avoiding potential errors from unexpected parameters.
56-58: Creating the issue with correct parametersThe
github.createIssuecall correctly usesrepoFullnameanddata, ensuring the API receives the necessary information.
61-61: Provided a helpful success summaryExporting a summary with the issue ID enhances user feedback upon successful execution.
52-54: Verify thatdatacontains only valid issue propertiesEnsure that
dataincludes only the properties accepted by the GitHub API for creating issues. This prevents errors caused by unexpected or invalid parameters.Run the following script to list all properties in
dataand compare them against the GitHub API documentation:components/github/github.app.mjs (2)
215-229: Great addition of themilestoneNumberpropertyThe new
milestoneNumberproperty is well-implemented, allowing users to associate issues with milestones effectively. The use ofgetRepositoryMilestonesensures that the options are dynamically fetched.
Line range hint
360-369: Verify safe usage of spreading...argsinto_makeRequestWhen spreading
...argsinto the_makeRequestmethod, ensure that only intended parameters are included to prevent potential security risks or unintended behavior.Run the following script to check for unintended parameters being passed through
...args:This will help identify any calls where
...argsmight include unwanted parameters.
| @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "name": "@pipedream/github", | |||
| "version": "1.4.0", | |||
| "version": "1.5.0", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Missing Changelog for Version 1.5.0
The package.json has been updated to version 1.5.0, but there is no CHANGELOG.md or equivalent documentation to reflect this change.
- Action Required: Please add a
CHANGELOG.mdfile to document the changes introduced in version 1.5.0.
Analysis chain
Version bump looks good.
The update from version 1.4.0 to 1.5.0 is consistent with the described improvements to GitHub app actions. This minor version increment suggests new features or improvements that are backwards compatible.
As a best practice, please ensure that the CHANGELOG.md file (if it exists) has been updated to reflect the changes in this new version. You can verify this with the following script:
Please verify if the project maintains release notes in an alternative file or location. If a changelog is maintained, ensure that version 1.5.0 is documented accordingly.
Please ensure that the version 1.5.0 is documented in the commit messages or any other relevant documentation. If not, consider adding a changelog to maintain proper version tracking.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if CHANGELOG.md exists and if it mentions the new version
if [ -f CHANGELOG.md ]; then
if grep -q "1.5.0" CHANGELOG.md; then
echo "CHANGELOG.md exists and mentions version 1.5.0"
else
echo "CHANGELOG.md exists but does not mention version 1.5.0"
fi
else
echo "CHANGELOG.md does not exist in the repository root"
fi
Length of output: 136
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for alternative changelog files and check for version 1.5.0 mentions
# Define possible changelog filenames
changelog_files=("CHANGELOG.md" "RELEASES.md" "HISTORY.md" "NEWS.md")
found=0
for file in "${changelog_files[@]}"; do
if [ -f "$file" ]; then
found=1
if grep -q "1.5.0" "$file"; then
echo "$file exists and mentions version 1.5.0"
else
echo "$file exists but does not mention version 1.5.0"
fi
fi
done
if [ "$found" -eq 0 ]; then
echo "No standard changelog files found in the repository."
fi
Length of output: 462
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search commit messages for version 1.5.0
git log --grep="1\.5\.0" --pretty=oneline
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Found commit messages referencing version 1.5.0"
else
echo "No commit messages reference version 1.5.0"
fi
Length of output: 266
| labels: { | ||
| label: "Labels", | ||
| description: "The label(s) to add to the issue", | ||
| type: "string[]", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| options: async () => { | ||
| const labels = await this.github.getRepositoryLabels({ | ||
| repoFullname: this.repoFullname, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| return labels.map(({ name }) => name); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider refactoring common patterns in 'assignees' and 'labels' properties
The 'labels' property is structurally similar to the 'assignees' property, with the main difference being the API call and the mapped property. This similarity suggests an opportunity for refactoring to reduce code duplication.
Consider creating a higher-order function to generate these property objects. This could improve maintainability and reduce the chance of inconsistencies. Here's a potential refactor:
const createAsyncProperty = (label, description, apiCall, mapFunction) => ({
label,
description,
type: "string[]",
optional: true,
options: async () => {
const items = await apiCall();
return items.map(mapFunction);
},
});
export default {
assignees: createAsyncProperty(
"Assignees",
"One or more Users to assign to this issue",
() => this.github.getRepositoryCollaborators({ repoFullname: this.repoFullname }),
({ login }) => login
),
labels: createAsyncProperty(
"Labels",
"The label(s) to add to the issue",
() => this.github.getRepositoryLabels({ repoFullname: this.repoFullname }),
({ name }) => name
),
// ... other properties
};This refactoring would also make it easier to add new properties with similar structures in the future.
| const date = new Date(this.since); | ||
| if (isNaN(date.getTime())) { | ||
| throw new ConfigurationError("Invalid date string provided"); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improved input validation with room for enhancement
The addition of input validation for the since parameter is a great improvement:
- It catches invalid date inputs early, preventing potential issues later in the execution.
- The use of
ConfigurationErrorprovides a clear and specific error message to the user.
These changes enhance the robustness and user-friendliness of the action.
However, the use of isNaN() for date validation is not ideal. As pointed out by the static analysis tool, isNaN() attempts type coercion and can be unreliable. Let's improve this by using Number.isNaN() instead:
- if (isNaN(date.getTime())) {
+ if (Number.isNaN(date.getTime())) {
throw new ConfigurationError("Invalid date string provided");
}This change will make the validation more robust and avoid potential issues with type coercion.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const date = new Date(this.since); | |
| if (isNaN(date.getTime())) { | |
| throw new ConfigurationError("Invalid date string provided"); | |
| } | |
| const date = new Date(this.since); | |
| if (Number.isNaN(date.getTime())) { | |
| throw new ConfigurationError("Invalid date string provided"); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 40-40: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
| export async function checkAdminPermission() { | ||
| const { | ||
| github, repoFullname, | ||
| } = this; | ||
| const { admin } = await getUserRepoPermissions(github, repoFullname); | ||
| return admin; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using this in exported functions without proper context
The exported functions checkAdminPermission and checkPushPermission rely on this to access github and repoFullname. If these functions are called without the correct binding, this may be undefined, leading to runtime errors. To make these functions more robust and easier to use, consider passing github and repoFullname as parameters instead.
Apply this diff to refactor the functions:
-export async function checkAdminPermission() {
+export async function checkAdminPermission(github, repoFullname) {
- const {
- github, repoFullname,
- } = this;
const { admin } = await getUserRepoPermissions(github, repoFullname);
return admin;
}
-export async function checkPushPermission() {
+export async function checkPushPermission(github, repoFullname) {
- const {
- github, repoFullname,
- } = this;
const { push } = await getUserRepoPermissions(github, repoFullname);
return push;
}Ensure that when calling these functions elsewhere in your codebase, you pass the github instance and repoFullname as arguments.
Also applies to: 18-23
| async function getUserRepoPermissions(github, repoFullname) { | ||
| const { login: username } = await github.getAuthenticatedUser(); | ||
| const { user: { permissions } } = await github.getUserRepoPermissions({ | ||
| repoFullname, | ||
| username, | ||
| }); | ||
| return permissions; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider caching permissions to reduce API calls
The functions checkAdminPermission and checkPushPermission both call getUserRepoPermissions, resulting in multiple API requests to GitHub when checking permissions frequently. This can lead to performance issues and hitting rate limits. Consider implementing caching for the user's permissions within a valid timeframe to minimize unnecessary API calls.
Also applies to: 10-16, 18-23
Add error handling for GitHub API calls
The function getUserRepoPermissions lacks error handling for potential failures in the GitHub API calls. If either getAuthenticatedUser or getUserRepoPermissions fails, it could cause unhandled promise rejections or runtime errors. Consider wrapping the API calls in a try-catch block to handle exceptions gracefully.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
async function getUserRepoPermissions(github, repoFullname) {
+ try {
const { login: username } = await github.getAuthenticatedUser();
const { user: { permissions } } = await github.getUserRepoPermissions({
repoFullname,
username,
});
return permissions;
+ } catch (error) {
+ // Handle the error appropriately, e.g., log it or return a default value
+ console.error('Error fetching user repository permissions:', error);
+ throw error; // Re-throw the error if necessary
+ }
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async function getUserRepoPermissions(github, repoFullname) { | |
| const { login: username } = await github.getAuthenticatedUser(); | |
| const { user: { permissions } } = await github.getUserRepoPermissions({ | |
| repoFullname, | |
| username, | |
| }); | |
| return permissions; | |
| } | |
| async function getUserRepoPermissions(github, repoFullname) { | |
| try { | |
| const { login: username } = await github.getAuthenticatedUser(); | |
| const { user: { permissions } } = await github.getUserRepoPermissions({ | |
| repoFullname, | |
| username, | |
| }); | |
| return permissions; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| // Handle the error appropriately, e.g., log it or return a default value | |
| console.error('Error fetching user repository permissions:', error); | |
| throw error; // Re-throw the error if necessary | |
| } | |
| } |
|
|
||
| export default { | ||
| key: "github-create-issue", | ||
| name: "Create Issue", | ||
| description: "Create a new issue in a Gihub repo. [See docs here](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/issues/issues#create-an-issue)", | ||
| version: "0.2.16", | ||
| description: "Create a new issue in a Gihub repo. [See the documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/issues/issues#create-an-issue)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo in description: Correct "Gihub" to "GitHub"
There's a typo in the description property. "Gihub" should be corrected to "GitHub".
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-description: "Create a new issue in a Gihub repo. [See the documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/issues/issues#create-an-issue)",
+description: "Create a new issue in a GitHub repo. [See the documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/issues/issues#create-an-issue)",Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| description: "Create a new issue in a Gihub repo. [See the documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/issues/issues#create-an-issue)", | |
| description: "Create a new issue in a GitHub repo. [See the documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/issues/issues#create-an-issue)", |
| async getRepositoryIssues({ | ||
| repoFullname, ...args | ||
| }) { | ||
| const results = await this._client().request(`GET /repos/${repoFullname}/issues`, { | ||
| state: "all", | ||
| ...args, | ||
| }); | ||
| return results.data; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure args do not override default parameters in getRepositoryIssues
In getRepositoryIssues, spreading ...args after setting state: "all" could allow args to override the state parameter. To prevent this, spread ...args before setting default parameters.
Apply this diff to fix the parameter order:
const results = await this._client().request(`GET /repos/${repoFullname}/issues`, {
- state: "all",
...args,
+ state: "all",
});Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async getRepositoryIssues({ | |
| repoFullname, ...args | |
| }) { | |
| const results = await this._client().request(`GET /repos/${repoFullname}/issues`, { | |
| state: "all", | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| return results.data; | |
| async getRepositoryIssues({ | |
| repoFullname, ...args | |
| }) { | |
| const results = await this._client().request(`GET /repos/${repoFullname}/issues`, { | |
| ...args, | |
| state: "all", | |
| }); | |
| return results.data; |
| async getRepositoryPullRequests({ | ||
| repoFullname, ...args | ||
| }) { | ||
| const response = await this._client().request(`GET /repos/${repoFullname}/pulls`, args ?? {}); | ||
| return response.data; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consistent handling of args in getRepositoryPullRequests
Currently, args are passed directly without default parameters, which differs from how getRepositoryIssues handles them. For consistency and to prevent potential issues, consider explicitly setting default parameters and ensuring args do not override them.
Apply this diff to align the method with best practices:
const response = await this._client().request(`GET /repos/${repoFullname}/pulls`, {
+ ...args,
+ state: "open",
});Ensure that args does not include parameters that may override critical defaults like state.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| async options({ | ||
| repoFullname, page = 0, | ||
| }) { | ||
| const issues = await this.getRepositoryIssues({ | ||
| page: page + 1, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using prevContext for pagination in async options
To maintain consistency with other options methods and improve pagination handling, consider using prevContext to manage the pagination state. This approach aligns with best practices and ensures smoother interaction with the API.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
async options({
- repoFullname, page = 0,
+ repoFullname,
+ prevContext,
}) {
- const issues = await this.getRepositoryIssues({
- page: page + 1,
- repoFullname,
- });
+ const page = prevContext?.page ?? 1;
+ const issues = await this.getRepositoryIssues({
+ repoFullname,
+ page,
+ });
+ const hasNextPage = issues.length > 0;
+ return {
+ options: issues.map((issue) => ({
+ label: issue.title,
+ value: +issue.number,
+ })),
+ context: hasNextPage ? { page: page + 1 } : null,
+ };
},Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async options({ | |
| repoFullname, page = 0, | |
| }) { | |
| const issues = await this.getRepositoryIssues({ | |
| page: page + 1, | |
| async options({ | |
| repoFullname, | |
| prevContext, | |
| }) { | |
| const page = prevContext?.page ?? 1; | |
| const issues = await this.getRepositoryIssues({ | |
| repoFullname, | |
| page, | |
| }); | |
| const hasNextPage = issues.length > 0; | |
| return { | |
| options: issues.map((issue) => ({ | |
| label: issue.title, | |
| value: +issue.number, | |
| })), | |
| context: hasNextPage ? { page: page + 1 } : null, | |
| }; | |
| }, |
| async options({ | ||
| repoFullname, page = 0, | ||
| }) { | ||
| const prs = await this.getRepositoryPullRequests({ | ||
| page: page + 1, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use prevContext for pagination in pullNumber options
For consistency and better pagination control in the pullNumber property, consider utilizing prevContext to manage pagination. This change will align it with other parts of the codebase and enhance maintainability.
Apply this diff:
async options({
- repoFullname, page = 0,
+ repoFullname,
+ prevContext,
}) {
- const prs = await this.getRepositoryPullRequests({
- page: page + 1,
- repoFullname,
- });
+ const page = prevContext?.page ?? 1;
+ const prs = await this.getRepositoryPullRequests({
+ repoFullname,
+ page,
+ });
+ const hasNextPage = prs.length > 0;
+ return {
+ options: prs.map((pr) => ({
+ label: pr.title,
+ value: +pr.number,
+ })),
+ context: hasNextPage ? { page: page + 1 } : null,
+ };
},Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async options({ | |
| repoFullname, page = 0, | |
| }) { | |
| const prs = await this.getRepositoryPullRequests({ | |
| page: page + 1, | |
| async options({ | |
| repoFullname, | |
| prevContext, | |
| }) { | |
| const page = prevContext?.page ?? 1; | |
| const prs = await this.getRepositoryPullRequests({ | |
| repoFullname, | |
| page, | |
| }); | |
| const hasNextPage = prs.length > 0; | |
| return { | |
| options: prs.map((pr) => ({ | |
| label: pr.title, | |
| value: +pr.number, | |
| })), | |
| context: hasNextPage ? { page: page + 1 } : null, | |
| }; | |
| }, |
…m/PipedreamHQ/pipedream into 13927-github-actions-improvements
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/github/actions/list-gists-for-a-user/list-gists-for-a-user.mjs (1)
22-32: LGTM: Dynamic property generation improves usabilityThe new
additionalPropsmethod enhances the action's user-friendliness:
- It automatically sets the default
usernameto the authenticated user's login.- This reduces manual input requirements, aligning with the PR objective of improving GitHub actions usability.
Consider adding error handling to the
additionalPropsmethod:async additionalProps() { - const { login } = await this.github.getAuthenticatedUser(); + try { + const { login } = await this.github.getAuthenticatedUser(); + return { + username: { + label: "Username", + description: "The username of the user whose gists you want to list", + type: "string", + default: login, + }, + }; + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to fetch authenticated user:", error); + return { + username: { + label: "Username", + description: "The username of the user whose gists you want to list", + type: "string", + required: true, + }, + }; + } - return { - username: { - label: "Username", - description: "The username of the user whose gists you want to list", - type: "string", - default: login, - }, - }; }This change will gracefully handle potential errors when fetching the authenticated user and ensure the action remains functional even if the default username can't be retrieved.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- components/github/actions/list-gists-for-a-user/list-gists-for-a-user.mjs (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
components/github/actions/list-gists-for-a-user/list-gists-for-a-user.mjs
[error] 40-40: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
Additional comments not posted (5)
components/github/actions/list-gists-for-a-user/list-gists-for-a-user.mjs (5)
7-8: LGTM: Improved documentation and version updateThe changes in these lines enhance the action's usability:
- The updated description now includes a link to the official documentation, which is helpful for users seeking more information.
- The version increment to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new functionality in this update.
These modifications align well with the PR objective of improving GitHub actions usability.
16-17: LGTM: Improved property descriptionThe updates to the
sinceproperty significantly enhance user understanding:
- The new label "Filter by Timestamp" is more descriptive and intuitive.
- The expanded description provides clear guidance on the expected timestamp format, including:
- An example of the ISO 8601 format
- A link to documentation on standard date/time formats
These changes directly address the PR objective of improving GitHub actions usability by making the interface more informative and user-friendly.
44-48: LGTM: Improved parameter handlingThe changes in these lines enhance the action's functionality and reliability:
- The new
sincevariable ensures that the timestamp is properly formatted in ISO 8601 format before being used in the API call.- Using the validated
sinceparameter in thelistGistsFromUsercall improves the accuracy of the results returned by the GitHub API.These modifications align with the PR objective of improving GitHub actions usability by ensuring correct API usage and data handling.
65-65: LGTM: Enhanced output messagesThe updates to the summary messages improve the action's feedback:
- The "No gists found" message now includes the specific username, providing context for the empty result.
- The success message now includes the number of gists fetched, giving users a quick overview of the action's outcome.
These changes align with the PR objective of improving GitHub actions usability by providing more informative and context-rich feedback to the user.
Also applies to: 69-69
11-13: LGTM: Enhanced property managementThe changes to the
githubproperty improve the action's flexibility:
- Using the spread operator ensures all properties from the
githubobject are included.- The addition of
reloadProps: truesuggests dynamic property reloading, which likely works in conjunction with the newadditionalPropsmethod.These modifications align with the PR objective of enhancing GitHub actions usability.
To ensure the
reloadPropsbehavior is working as intended, please run the following verification script:Verification successful
LGTM: Consistent use of
reloadPropsThe addition of
reloadProps: trueto thegithubproperty aligns with its widespread usage across the codebase and is supported by existing documentation. This enhancement ensures consistent and dynamic property management within GitHub actions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and impact of reloadProps in the github app # Test: Search for other occurrences of reloadProps echo "Searching for other occurrences of reloadProps:" rg --type javascript 'reloadProps:\s*true' # Test: Check if there are any comments or documentation about reloadProps echo "Checking for documentation about reloadProps:" rg --type javascript -i 'reloadProps.*\n.*\*'Length of output: 525
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and impact of reloadProps in the github app with corrected commands # Test: Search for other occurrences of reloadProps without specifying file type echo "Searching for other occurrences of reloadProps:" rg 'reloadProps:\s*true' # Test: Check if there are any comments or documentation about reloadProps with multiline support echo "Checking for documentation about reloadProps:" rg --multiline -i 'reloadProps.*\n.*\*'Length of output: 41974
| const date = this.since && new Date(this.since); | ||
| if (date && isNaN(date.valueOf())) { | ||
| throw new ConfigurationError("Invalid date string provided"); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improved input validation with room for enhancement
The addition of input validation for the since parameter is a great improvement:
- It catches invalid date inputs early, preventing potential issues later in the execution.
- The use of
ConfigurationErrorprovides a clear and specific error message to the user.
These changes enhance the robustness and user-friendliness of the action, aligning with the PR objectives.
However, the use of isNaN() for date validation is not ideal. As pointed out by the static analysis tool, isNaN() attempts type coercion and can be unreliable. Let's improve this by using Number.isNaN() instead:
const date = this.since && new Date(this.since);
-if (date && isNaN(date.valueOf())) {
+if (date && Number.isNaN(date.valueOf())) {
throw new ConfigurationError("Invalid date string provided");
}This change will make the validation more robust and avoid potential issues with type coercion.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const date = this.since && new Date(this.since); | |
| if (date && isNaN(date.valueOf())) { | |
| throw new ConfigurationError("Invalid date string provided"); | |
| } | |
| const date = this.since && new Date(this.since); | |
| if (date && Number.isNaN(date.valueOf())) { | |
| throw new ConfigurationError("Invalid date string provided"); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 40-40: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs (2)
5-7: Metadata updates look good, consider semantic versioning.The changes to the action's name, description, and version improve clarity and provide better guidance to users. Great job on including the documentation link!
Consider using semantic versioning more strictly. Given the changes described in the PR, this might be better as version "0.1.0" or "1.0.0" if it's considered feature-complete.
35-43: Excellent improvement to thebranchproperty, minor suggestion for description.The use of
propDefinitionfor thebranchproperty is a great improvement. It allows for dynamic retrieval of branch options based on the selected repository, enhancing the action's flexibility and user-friendliness.Consider updating the description to be more specific:
"The branch to use. If not specified, defaults to the repository's default branch (usually `main` or `master`)",This clarifies that the branch is optional and what happens when it's not specified.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
Biome
components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs
[error] 53-53: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (2)
components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs (2)
48-53: Great refactoring of therunmethod.The changes to the
runmethod improve code readability and maintainability. Using object destructuring and the spread operator simplifies the function call while ensuring all necessary data is passed tocreateOrUpdateFileContent.🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 53-53: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Line range hint
1-64: Overall, excellent improvements to the GitHub action.These changes significantly enhance the usability and maintainability of the "Create or Update File Contents" action. The updates to the metadata,
branchproperty, andrunmethod all contribute to making the action more user-friendly and efficient. These improvements align well with the PR objectives of enhancing GitHub app actions.Great job on implementing these changes! They will undoubtedly improve the developer experience when working with this action.
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 53-53: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
| } = this; | ||
| const response = await github.createOrUpdateFileContent({ | ||
| ...data, | ||
| branch: branch && branch.split("/")[0], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using optional chaining for modern JavaScript environments.
If your project supports ES2020 or later, you could use the optional chaining operator to make this line more concise:
| branch: branch && branch.split("/")[0], | |
| branch: branch?.split("/")[0], |
This change would be equivalent to the current code but more aligned with modern JavaScript practices. However, ensure that your runtime environment supports this feature before implementing it.
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 53-53: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs (1)
5-7: Approve changes with a minor suggestion.The updates to the action name, description, and version are good improvements:
- The capitalized name enhances readability.
- The updated description with a link to documentation is more helpful.
- The version increment reflects the changes made.
Consider using semantic versioning more strictly. Since this appears to be a feature update rather than just a patch, you might want to increment the minor version to 0.1.0 (if it wasn't already 0.0.x) or even 1.0.0 if the action is considered stable and feature-complete.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
Biome
components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs
[error] 53-53: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (4)
components/github/actions/create-or-update-file-contents/create-or-update-file-contents.mjs (4)
35-41: Excellent enhancement to the branch property!The update to use
propDefinitionfor thebranchproperty is a significant improvement:
- It dynamically retrieves branch options based on the selected repository.
- This enhances user experience by providing relevant choices in context.
- The implementation is correct and aligns well with the action's purpose.
43-43: Approve the improved branch description.The updated description for the
branchproperty is more informative and accurate:
- It clearly states that the default is the repository's default branch.
- It acknowledges the common default branch names (
mainormaster).- This change helps users better understand the behavior of the action.
48-53: Approve refactoring with a suggestion for improvement.The refactoring of the
runmethod is a good improvement:
- Using object destructuring enhances code readability.
- Passing a single object to
createOrUpdateFileContentsimplifies the function call.Consider using optional chaining for the
branchproperty processing:branch: branch?.split("/")[1],This change would make the code more concise and align with modern JavaScript practices, assuming your environment supports ES2020 or later.
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 53-53: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Line range hint
1-64: Summary of improvementsOverall, these changes significantly enhance the GitHub action:
- Improved clarity in naming and description.
- Enhanced functionality with dynamic branch options.
- Better code organization and readability through modern JavaScript practices.
- More informative property descriptions for users.
These improvements align well with the PR objectives of enhancing usability and efficiency of GitHub actions. Great work on making the action more user-friendly and maintainable!
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 53-53: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
|
/approve |
|
This had a conflict with a recently merged PR 😬 need another approval |
|
/approve |
Closes #13927
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
runmethod for improved readability and maintainability.Version Updates
webhook-events.mjsfrom "1.0.6" to "1.0.7."new-branch.mjsfrom "1.0.6" to "1.0.7."new-card-in-column.mjsfrom "1.0.5" to "1.0.6."new-collaborator.mjsfrom "1.0.6" to "1.0.7."new-commit-comment.mjsfrom "1.0.6" to "1.0.7."new-commit.mjsfrom "1.0.7" to "1.0.8."new-discussion.mjsfrom "1.0.6" to "1.0.7."new-fork.mjsfrom "1.0.6" to "1.0.7."new-issue-with-status.mjsfrom "0.1.3" to "0.1.4."new-label.mjsfrom "1.0.6" to "1.0.7."new-or-updated-issue.mjsfrom "1.1.3" to "1.1.4."new-or-updated-milestone.mjsfrom "1.1.3" to "1.1.4."new-or-updated-pull-request.mjsfrom "1.2.3" to "1.2.4."new-release.mjsfrom "1.0.6" to "1.0.7."new-star.mjsfrom "1.0.6" to "1.0.7."