-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New Components - sms_fusion #14382
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
New Components - sms_fusion #14382
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules for the SMS Fusion integration, enabling functionalities such as retrieving account balance, performing HLR lookups, and sending SMS messages. Each module is defined as an action with specific metadata and properties. The core functionalities are encapsulated in asynchronous Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/sms_fusion/actions/perform-hlr-lookup/perform-hlr-lookup.mjs (1)
18-23
: Add description for countryCode prop.The
countryCode
prop should include a description explaining the expected format and valid values, similar to howphoneNumber
is documented.countryCode: { propDefinition: [ smsFusion, "countryCode", ], + description: "The country code in numeric format without leading zeros or symbols. Example: `61` for Australia", },
components/sms_fusion/actions/send-sms/send-sms.mjs (1)
1-8
: LGTM! Consider enhancing the documentation.The metadata structure is well-defined and follows Pipedream's conventions. The documentation link is a great addition.
Consider adding rate limiting information to the description:
- description: "Send an SMS using SMS Fusion. [See the documentation](https://docs.smsfusion.com.au/)", + description: "Send an SMS using SMS Fusion. [See the documentation](https://docs.smsfusion.com.au/) for rate limits and usage guidelines.",components/sms_fusion/sms_fusion.app.mjs (1)
23-40
: Ensure correct context binding in_makeRequest
The parameter
$ = this
in the_makeRequest
method may lead to confusion or unintended behavior. Ensure that the context is correctly bound when making requests.If the intention is to allow overriding the
$
context, consider documenting this behavior. Otherwise, you can simplify the method:_makeRequest({ - $ = this, + $, path, params, ...opts }) { - return axios($, { + return axios(this, {Or, if
$
is always intended to bethis
, you can remove it from the parameters:_makeRequest({ - $ = this, path, params, ...opts }) { - return axios($, { + return axios(this, {Clarify the usage to prevent potential misuse.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- components/sms_fusion/actions/get-balance/get-balance.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/sms_fusion/actions/perform-hlr-lookup/perform-hlr-lookup.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/sms_fusion/actions/send-sms/send-sms.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/sms_fusion/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/sms_fusion/sms_fusion.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
components/sms_fusion/package.json (2)
3-3
: LGTM: Version bump aligns with changes.The minor version increment (0.0.1 → 0.1.0) appropriately reflects the addition of new features (balance checking, HLR lookup, SMS sending) without breaking changes.
15-17
: Verify @pipedream/platform version compatibility.The dependency on @pipedream/platform is correctly added, but let's verify this is the latest compatible version for the new SMS Fusion features.
components/sms_fusion/actions/get-balance/get-balance.mjs (2)
1-1
: LGTM!The import statement is clean and follows the correct relative path structure.
12-18
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider filtering sensitive data from response
While the implementation is correct, consider filtering out any sensitive information from the API response before returning it. The SMS Fusion API response might contain account details or credentials that shouldn't be exposed.
Let's check the API response structure:
Consider implementing response filtering:
async run({ $ }) { const response = await this.smsFusion.getBalance({ $, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved account balance"); - return response; + const { balance, currency } = response; + return { balance, currency }; },components/sms_fusion/actions/perform-hlr-lookup/perform-hlr-lookup.mjs (1)
1-8
: LGTM! Well-structured action configuration.The action metadata is well-defined with proper naming conventions and includes helpful documentation links.
components/sms_fusion/sms_fusion.app.mjs (1)
34-38
:⚠️ Potential issueAvoid passing API key in query parameters
Passing the API key in the query parameters can expose it in browser history, logs, or intermediary proxies. It's more secure to pass sensitive information like API keys in the request headers.
Please check if the SMS Fusion API supports passing the API key in headers. If supported, you can modify the request as follows:
headers: { "Accept": "application/json", + "Authorization": `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`, }, params: { ...params, - key: `${this.$auth.api_key}`, },If the API does not support headers for the API key, consider communicating with the provider about supporting more secure authentication methods.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @michelle0927 lgtm! Ready for QA!
Resolves #14262
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Updates
These enhancements improve user interaction with SMS Fusion, providing essential functionalities for managing SMS services.