fix: Enforce string limits #14953
fix: Enforce string limits #14953
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Moshe Grunwald <34072688+TheBestMoshe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@adolfo-pd has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve minor formatting updates across several files, primarily the addition of newlines at the end of specific JavaScript files. Additionally, updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you so much for submitting this! We've added it to our backlog to review, and our team has been notified. |
|
Thanks for submitting this PR! When we review PRs, we follow the Pipedream component guidelines. If you're not familiar, here's a quick checklist:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (1)
191-191: Fix object destructuring formattingAdd line breaks in the object destructuring to match the project's style guide.
- const { min = 1, max } = prop as unknown as { min?: number, max?: number } + const { + min = 1, + max, + } = prop as unknown as { min?: number, max?: number }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 191-191: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 191-191: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
components/onelogin/onelogin.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/pennylane.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/pingone/pingone.app.mjs(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/package.json(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- components/pingone/pingone.app.mjs
- components/pennylane/pennylane.app.mjs
- packages/connect-react/package.json
- packages/connect-react/CHANGELOG.md
- components/onelogin/onelogin.app.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx
[error] 191-191: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 191-191: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (1)
191-198: Verify impact and add tests for string validation
The new string length validation could impact existing forms, especially with the default min=1 requirement. Please:
- Add unit tests covering various string validation scenarios
- Document the validation rules in code comments
- Consider a migration strategy for existing forms that might break with the new validation
Let's check for potential impact:
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 191-191: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 191-191: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (1)
191-205: LGTM! String validation implementation looks solid.The implementation includes:
- Type-safe interface extension
- Clear error messages with actual limits
- Sensible defaults (min=0)
- Proper validation logic for string lengths
Minor formatting issue: The closing brace on line 206 appears to have incorrect indentation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (1)
191-205: Verify impact on existing forms and add documentation.
While the string validation implementation is solid, consider:
- Migration: Existing forms with string props might need updates to handle the new validation
- Documentation: The new string validation capabilities should be documented for component authors
- Testing: Ensure test coverage for various string validation scenarios
Let's check for existing string props that might be affected:
Consider adding validation examples to the component development guidelines to help component authors properly utilize these new string validation capabilities.
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
connect-reactpackage.package.jsonforconnect-reactpackage.Style