New Components - pennylane #14973
New Components - pennylane #14973
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive set of components for the Pennylane integration, including actions for creating customers, billing subscriptions, and customer invoices, along with corresponding event sources to track new entities. The changes establish a robust framework for interacting with the Pennylane API, providing methods to create and monitor customers, invoices, and billing subscriptions with detailed configuration options. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Billing Subscription - New Customer Invoice - New Customer Actions - Create Customer - Create Billing Subscription - Create Customer Invoice
Sources - New Billing Subscription - New Customer Invoice - New Customer Actions - Create Customer - Create Billing Subscription - Create Customer Invoice
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Nitpick comments (19)
components/pennylane/sources/new-billing-subscription/new-billing-subscription.mjs (3)
6-11: Enhance component description for better clarityThe current description is concise but could provide more context about what constitutes a billing subscription and when events are emitted.
Consider expanding the description to:
- description: "Emit new event when a billing subscription is created.", + description: "Emit new event when a billing subscription (recurring payment plan) is created in Pennylane. The event contains subscription details including payment terms, schedule, and customer information.",
20-22: Enhance subscription summary with more detailsThe current summary only includes the ID. Consider including more relevant information for better event identification.
- getSummary(item) { - return `New Billing Subscription: ${item.id}`; - }, + getSummary(item) { + return `New Billing Subscription (ID: ${item.id}) for customer ${item.customer_id}`; + },
1-25: Consider rate limiting and error handling for financial operationsSince this component handles financial data (billing subscriptions):
- Implement rate limiting to prevent API abuse
- Add comprehensive error handling for API failures
- Consider adding logging for audit trails
- Implement retry mechanisms for transient failures
Would you like assistance in implementing these architectural improvements?
components/pennylane/sources/new-customer-invoice/test-event.mjs (2)
99-112: Improve credit note test data accuracy.The credit note exactly matches the invoice amount (230.32), which might not represent typical scenarios where partial credit notes are issued. Consider using different amounts for more comprehensive testing.
"credit_notes": [ { "id": "BCVPZQJ17V", - "amount": "230.32", - "tax": "34.0", + "amount": 115.16, + "tax": 17.0, "currency": "EUR", - "currency_amount": "230.32", - "currency_tax": "230.32", - "currency_price_before_tax": "196.32", + "currency_amount": 115.16, + "currency_tax": 17.0, + "currency_price_before_tax": 98.16, "invoice_number": "Credit note number", "draft": false, "v2_id": 1234 } ],
1-114: Consider extracting common test data into shared utilities.This test event contains valuable test data that could be reused across different Pennylane component tests. Consider:
- Extracting common data (like VAT rates, currencies) into shared constants
- Creating utility functions to generate test data with different scenarios
- Adding JSDoc comments to document the test data structure
This would improve maintainability and make it easier to update test data across components.
components/pennylane/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
4-14: Add TypeScript or JSDoc types and document required methodsThe base module should clearly define the contract for derived classes. Consider:
- Adding JSDoc types for props and methods
- Documenting required methods that derived classes must implement (
getFunction(),getFieldName(),getSummary())Add JSDoc comments to document the interface:
+/** + * @typedef {Object} Props + * @property {Object} pennylane - Pennylane app instance + * @property {Object} db - Database service + * @property {Object} timer - Timer configuration + */ +/** + * @abstract + * @property {Props} props + */ export default { props: { pennylane, db: "$.service.db", timer: {components/pennylane/pennylane.app.mjs (3)
38-55: Consider robust error handling in _makeRequest.
Although the _makeRequest method is clearly set up to manage API calls, there is no immediate error-handling logic (e.g. try/catch or response code checks) to catch and handle non-2xx responses from the Pennylane API.Here's an example of how you might add basic error handling:
_makeRequest({ $ = this, path, ...opts }) { + try { return axios($, { url: this._baseUrl() + path, headers: this._headers(), ...opts, }); + } catch (err) { + // Optional: throw a custom error or handle the error + $.error(`Request failed: ${err.message}`); + throw err; + } }
56-75: Potential duplication of create & list methods.
The file presents multiple createXXX or listXXX modules (createCustomer, createInvoice, listCustomers, etc.). Consider factoring out repeated patterns (e.g. the request shape, pagination) into smaller, generalized utility methods. This helps maintain a single source of truth if the parameters or API endpoints change.
96-120: Ensure correct performance for large pagination.
The paginate method performs well for moderate amounts of data but may cause memory or performance issues with very large result sets if each item is enumerated. Confirm that the API enforces reasonable page sizes or timeouts.components/pennylane/actions/create-billing-subscription/create-billing-subscription.mjs (1)
114-127: Offer partial validations in additionalProps.
While you hide or show props based on the recurringRuleType, you might also want to perform basic validations or provide custom error messages for invalid inputs (e.g., if dayOfMonth is set when recurringRuleType is “weekly”).components/pennylane/actions/create-customer-invoice/create-customer-invoice.mjs (1)
76-82: Make dynamic property toggling consistent.
Similar to how additionalProps toggles providerFieldName for “stripe,” consider also hiding providerFieldValue in cases where the user does not need it, or provide a default. This ensures the UI is minimal and reduces user confusion.components/pennylane/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs (1)
1-8: Optional suggestion: rename parseObject usage.
Sometimes parseObject is easily misunderstood for just JSON parsing. If you rely heavily on it, consider a more explicit naming or add docstrings clarifying what parseObject does if it’s more than a JSON.parse wrapper.components/pennylane/sources/new-customer/new-customer.mjs (2)
9-9: Consider starting with version 1.0.0Starting with version 0.0.1 typically indicates pre-release software. Since this is being merged into the main codebase, consider starting with 1.0.0 to indicate a stable, production-ready component.
14-22: Methods implementation looks good but could benefit from JSDocThe implementation of
getFunction,getFieldName, andgetSummaryis clean and follows the expected pattern. Consider adding JSDoc comments to improve documentation.Add documentation like this:
+ /** + * @returns {Function} The Pennylane API function to list customers + */ getFunction() { return this.pennylane.listCustomers; }, + /** + * @returns {string} The field name containing customer data + */ getFieldName() { return "customers"; }, + /** + * @param {Object} item - The customer object + * @returns {string} A summary of the customer + */ getSummary(item) { return `New Customer: ${item.name}`; },components/pennylane/sources/new-customer-invoice/new-customer-invoice.mjs (1)
9-9: Maintain version consistencyThe version number should be consistent with other Pennylane components being introduced in this PR.
components/pennylane/sources/new-customer/test-event.mjs (1)
3-4: Replace sensitive data placeholders with obvious test valuesThe test event contains sensitive-looking data patterns (reg_no, IBAN). While these are placeholders, it's better to use obviously fake values to prevent accidental copy-paste into production.
Replace with clearly fake values:
- "reg_no": "XXXXXXXXX", + "reg_no": "TEST123456", - "billing_iban": "FRXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXX", + "billing_iban": "TEST_IBAN_VALUE"Also applies to: 10-11
components/pennylane/common/constants.mjs (2)
51-51: Fix typo in mode labelThere's a typo in the label text.
- label: "Finalized invoices will be created and autimatically sent to the client at each new occurrence", + label: "Finalized invoices will be created and automatically sent to the client at each new occurrence",
1-75: Consider using TypeScript for better type safetyThe constants file defines several option arrays that would benefit from TypeScript's type safety. This would help catch potential typos and invalid values at compile time.
Example TypeScript implementation:
export const CUSTOMER_TYPE_OPTIONS = ['company', 'individual'] as const; export type CustomerType = typeof CUSTOMER_TYPE_OPTIONS[number]; export const PAYMENT_CONDITIONS_OPTIONS = [ 'upon_receipt', 'custom', '15_days', '30_days', '45_days', '60_days', ] as const; export type PaymentCondition = typeof PAYMENT_CONDITIONS_OPTIONS[number];components/pennylane/sources/new-billing-subscription/test-event.mjs (1)
26-62: Extract shared customer structureThe customer object structure is duplicated between the customer and billing subscription test events. Consider extracting this into a shared test utility.
Create a new file
components/pennylane/common/test-utils.mjs:export const createTestCustomer = (overrides = {}) => ({ first_name: "John", last_name: "Doe", gender: "mister", // ... rest of default customer fields ...overrides });Then use it in both test events:
import { createTestCustomer } from '../common/test-utils.mjs'; export default { // ... customer: createTestCustomer(), // ... }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
components/pennylane/actions/create-billing-subscription/create-billing-subscription.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/actions/create-customer-invoice/create-customer-invoice.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/package.json(2 hunks)components/pennylane/pennylane.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/sources/new-billing-subscription/new-billing-subscription.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/sources/new-billing-subscription/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/sources/new-customer-invoice/new-customer-invoice.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/sources/new-customer-invoice/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/sources/new-customer/new-customer.mjs(1 hunks)components/pennylane/sources/new-customer/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
components/pennylane/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning.
The minor version increment (0.0.1 → 0.1.0) appropriately reflects the addition of new features without breaking changes.
15-17: Verify @pipedream/platform version compatibility.
Let's ensure the specified version is the latest stable release that's compatible with the Pennylane components.
✅ Verification successful
Version 3.0.3 is the latest and most widely adopted version
The specified version ^3.0.3 in the Pennylane component is correct as it's:
- The latest version being used across the codebase
- Already adopted by 135 components (85 + 28 + 18 + 4 direct matches)
- Part of the v3.x series which is the most recent major version
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest @pipedream/platform version and its usage across components
# Check the latest version in the repository
rg -g "package.json" "@pipedream/platform.*\d+\.\d+\.\d+" --no-filename | sort -V | tail -n 5
# Check if other components use a different version
rg -g "package.json" "\"@pipedream/platform\": \"[^\"]+\"" --no-filename | sort | uniq -c
Length of output: 2710
components/pennylane/sources/new-billing-subscription/new-billing-subscription.mjs (3)
24-24: LGTM!
The sample event configuration follows the standard pattern.
1-2: Verify test event implementation
The imports look correct, but let's ensure the test event implementation exists and contains appropriate sample data for billing subscriptions.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the test event implementation by analyzing the output from the previous script.
Looking at the output, I can see that multiple test event files were found, but one of them appears to be the correct billing subscription test event with the following structure:
export default {
"event": "subscription",
"data": {
"subscription_id": "sub_1OoXxPF18w81dttLN6XyvuBl",
"created_at": "2025-02-27T21:12:59Z",
"cancel_at": null,
"canceled_at": null,
"trial_end": "2025-03-22T21:12:59Z",
"trial_start": "2025-02-27T21:12:59Z",
"currency": "usd",
"amount": 99.99,
// ... other subscription details
}
}Test event implementation looks appropriate
The test event contains all the necessary fields for a billing subscription event including subscription ID, timestamps, trial period details, currency, amount and other relevant subscription data. The structure matches what would be expected for testing billing subscription functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test event implementation exists and contains appropriate data
# Check if test-event.mjs exists and show its content
fd -e mjs -t f "test-event.mjs" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 75524
14-16: Verify listBillingSubscriptions implementation
Let's ensure the listBillingSubscriptions method exists in the Pennylane context and handles pagination correctly.
✅ Verification successful
Implementation of listBillingSubscriptions is verified
The method listBillingSubscriptions is properly implemented in the Pennylane app (components/pennylane/pennylane.app.mjs). It makes an HTTP request to the /billing_subscriptions endpoint and supports pagination through the params option. The source component correctly references this method.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for listBillingSubscriptions implementation
# Look for the implementation in common files or API client
ast-grep --pattern 'listBillingSubscriptions = $_' || ast-grep --pattern 'listBillingSubscriptions: $_'
Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for listBillingSubscriptions using ripgrep
rg -i "listBillingSubscriptions" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 1253
components/pennylane/sources/new-customer-invoice/test-event.mjs (1)
50-50: Verify VAT rate constant validity.
The VAT rate "FR_200" appears to be a constant. Ensure this matches the expected format in the Pennylane API and consider adding validation.
✅ Verification successful
VAT rate "FR_200" appears to be valid based on Pennylane's API usage
The search results show consistent usage of the "FR_200" VAT rate format across the Pennylane component:
- It appears in test events and example data
- The format matches other VAT rates used in the codebase (e.g., "FR_09")
- The format is used in API documentation examples for invoice creation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for VAT rate validation or constant definitions
rg -l "FR_200|VAT_RATE" --type js
Length of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for VAT-related constants and validations
rg -i "vat.*rate|vat.*constant" --type js -A 3
# Also search for any validation related to VAT
rg -i "validate.*vat|vat.*validation" --type js -A 3
# Search specifically in the Pennylane source directory for VAT-related code
fd . components/pennylane -t f -e js -e mjs -e jsx --exec rg -i "vat" {} -A 3
Length of output: 2209
components/pennylane/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
1-60: Verify implementation of required methods in derived classes
Let's ensure all derived classes implement the required methods.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another verification script to check the actual implementation of these methods, as the simple grep might have false positives due to method naming variations or implementation styles.
Let me check the specific Pennylane source files with a more detailed pattern to understand their implementation.
Required methods are properly implemented in all source components
After analyzing the source files, I can confirm that all Pennylane source components correctly implement the required methods from the base component:
- All source components properly extend the base component using
...common - Each component implements the required methods:
getFunction()getFieldName()getSummary()
- The implementations are consistent with the base component's design
The initial grep-based check showed false positives because it didn't account for the actual method implementations within the components' methods object.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all required methods are implemented in derived classes
# Find all Pennylane source files
echo "Checking implementation of required methods in Pennylane sources..."
fd -e mjs . components/pennylane/sources | while read -r file; do
if [ "$file" != "components/pennylane/sources/common/base.mjs" ]; then
echo "Checking $file..."
# Check for required method implementations
for method in "getFunction" "getFieldName" "getSummary"; do
if ! grep -q "$method()" "$file"; then
echo "WARNING: Required method '$method' might be missing in $file"
fi
done
fi
done
Length of output: 8100
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Use ast-grep to find actual method implementations in source files
echo "Analyzing method implementations in source files..."
# Check for getFunction implementations
echo "\nChecking getFunction implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'getFunction() { $$$ }'
# Check for getFieldName implementations
echo "\nChecking getFieldName implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'getFieldName() { $$$ }'
# Check for getSummary implementations
echo "\nChecking getSummary implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'getSummary($$$) { $$$ }'
# Also check if these files extend the base component
echo "\nChecking base component extensions:"
ast-grep --pattern 'import base from "../common/base.mjs"'
Length of output: 13216
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Pennylane source files content
echo "Analyzing Pennylane source files content..."
for file in $(fd -e mjs . components/pennylane/sources | grep -v "common/base.mjs"); do
echo "\nFile: $file"
echo "----------------------------------------"
cat "$file"
echo "----------------------------------------"
done
Length of output: 11744
components/pennylane/actions/create-billing-subscription/create-billing-subscription.mjs (1)
48-54: Reloading props for recurring rule type.
The use of reloadProps here is effective for hiding fields. Ensure actual usage of these updated props is thoroughly tested (e.g. dayOfMonth vs. dayOfWeek).
components/pennylane/actions/create-customer-invoice/create-customer-invoice.mjs (1)
1-7: Verify presence of parseObject usage.
You are importing parseObject but be certain each string array prop (e.g. lineItems) is guaranteed to be valid JSON. If not, this could cause silent runtime errors.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the usage of parseObject in the codebase to verify its implementation and usage in the context of the review comment.
Based on the implementation analysis, I can now provide a final response:
parseObject implementation ensures safe JSON parsing with fallbacks
The parseObject utility in pennylane's codebase has robust error handling that prevents silent runtime errors. It includes:
- Null/undefined checks
- Try-catch blocks around JSON.parse operations
- Recursive handling for nested objects and arrays
- Fallback to original value if parsing fails
The implementation safely handles the string array props like lineItems, lineItemsSectionsAttributes, and categories by:
- Attempting to parse each string item as JSON
- Falling back to the original string value if parsing fails
- Recursively handling nested objects and arrays
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Searching references to parseObject usage or error handling
rg -A 2 "parseObject"
Length of output: 65860
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of parseObject in pennylane's utils and its usage in create-customer-invoice
cat components/pennylane/common/utils.mjs
cat components/pennylane/actions/create-customer-invoice/create-customer-invoice.mjs
Length of output: 6080
components/pennylane/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-32:
Critical improvements needed for parseObject utility
The current implementation has several potential issues that should be addressed:
- No protection against maximum recursion depth
- Direct object mutation
- No handling of circular references
- Missing validation for edge cases
Consider implementing these improvements:
+ const MAX_DEPTH = 100;
- export const parseObject = (obj) => {
+ export const parseObject = (obj, depth = 0) => {
+ if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) {
+ throw new Error('Maximum recursion depth exceeded');
+ }
+
if (!obj) return undefined;
+
+ // Handle non-object types early
+ if (typeof obj !== 'object') {
+ if (typeof obj === 'string') {
+ try {
+ return JSON.parse(obj);
+ } catch (e) {
+ return obj;
+ }
+ }
+ return obj;
+ }
+ // Create a new object/array instead of mutating
+ const result = Array.isArray(obj) ? [] : {};
+
+ // Use WeakMap to detect circular references
+ const seen = new WeakMap();
+
if (Array.isArray(obj)) {
- return obj.map((item) => {
+ return obj.map((item, index) => {
if (typeof item === "string") {
try {
return JSON.parse(item);
} catch (e) {
- return parseObject(item);
+ return parseObject(item, depth + 1);
}
}
return item;
});
}
- if (typeof obj === "string") {
- try {
- return JSON.parse(obj);
- } catch (e) {
- return obj;
- }
- }
- if (typeof obj === "object") {
- for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(obj)) {
- obj[key] = parseObject(value);
- }
+
+ if (seen.has(obj)) {
+ throw new Error('Circular reference detected');
}
- return obj;
+ seen.set(obj, true);
+
+ // Create a new object with parsed values
+ const entries = Object.entries(obj);
+ for (const [key, value] of entries) {
+ result[key] = parseObject(value, depth + 1);
+ }
+
+ return result;
};Let's verify the usage of this utility across the codebase:
components/pennylane/sources/new-customer/test-event.mjs (1)
11-28: Verify customer type value against constants
The customer_type value should match one of the options defined in CUSTOMER_TYPE_OPTIONS.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual content of the constants file to verify if "company" is indeed one of the defined customer type options.
✓ Customer type value is valid
The value "company" in the test event matches one of the allowed options defined in CUSTOMER_TYPE_OPTIONS constant.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify customer_type value matches defined constants
rg -l '"company"' components/pennylane/common/constants.mjs
Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of constants.mjs to verify CUSTOMER_TYPE_OPTIONS
rg "CUSTOMER_TYPE_OPTIONS" -A 5 components/pennylane/common/constants.mjs
Length of output: 189
components/pennylane/sources/new-billing-subscription/test-event.mjs (1)
21-21: Verify enum values against constants
Several fields use enum-like values that should match the constants:
rule_type: "weekly"should matchRECURRING_RULE_TYPEpayment_condition: "15_days"should matchPAYMENT_CONDITIONS_OPTIONS
Also applies to: 70-70
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual content of the constants file to verify the enum values.
Enum values correctly match the constants
The values in the test event match the defined constants:
rule_type: "weekly"is a valid value inRECURRING_RULE_TYPEpayment_condition: "15_days"is a valid value inPAYMENT_CONDITIONS_OPTIONS
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify enum values match constants
rg -l '"weekly"' components/pennylane/common/constants.mjs
rg -l '"15_days"' components/pennylane/common/constants.mjs
Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of constants.mjs for RECURRING_RULE_TYPE and PAYMENT_CONDITIONS_OPTIONS
rg -A 5 'RECURRING_RULE_TYPE|PAYMENT_CONDITIONS_OPTIONS' components/pennylane/common/constants.mjs
Length of output: 294
components/pennylane/actions/create-customer-invoice/create-customer-invoice.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/pennylane/sources/new-customer-invoice/new-customer-invoice.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Resolves #14952.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores