Skip to content

New Components - clearly_defined #15455

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025
Merged

New Components - clearly_defined #15455

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

michelle0927
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 commented Jan 29, 2025

Resolves #9458

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added new actions for ClearlyDefined API interactions:
      • Create definitions
      • Get definitions
      • Get harvests
    • Introduced comprehensive configuration options for searching and retrieving component definitions
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced API interaction methods
    • Added support for flexible querying with multiple search parameters
  • Package Updates

    • Upgraded package version to 0.1.0
    • Added platform dependency

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 29, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 29, 2025 8:30pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 29, 2025 8:30pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 29, 2025 8:30pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive update to the ClearlyDefined component in the Pipedream platform. The changes include creating new modules for actions like creating definitions, getting definitions, and retrieving harvests. The clearly_defined.app.mjs file has been enhanced with new methods and property definitions, and a new constants.mjs file has been added to support these actions. The package version has been updated, and dependencies have been specified to support the new functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/clearly_defined/actions/create-definition/create-definition.mjs New module for creating definitions with metadata and run method
components/clearly_defined/actions/get-definitions/get-definitions.mjs New module for retrieving definitions with multiple search parameters
components/clearly_defined/actions/get-harvests/get-harvests.mjs New module for fetching harvest data for specific component revisions
components/clearly_defined/clearly_defined.app.mjs Added new properties, methods for API interactions including getDefinitions, getHarvests, and createDefinition
components/clearly_defined/common/constants.mjs Added constants for component types, providers, sort fields, directions, and response forms
components/clearly_defined/package.json Updated version to 0.1.0, added @pipedream/platform dependency

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement ClearlyDefined API components [#9458]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

action, User submitted, trigger / source

Suggested reviewers

  • GTFalcao

Poem

🐰 In the realm of data, clear and bright,
Definitions dance with rabbit's might
Components weave their magic spell
ClearlyDefined, we know so well!
Harvests gathered, secrets unfurled 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/clearly_defined/clearly_defined.app.mjs (2)

1-3: Add JSDoc type definitions for better code documentation.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to improve code documentation and IDE support.

+/** @typedef {import('@pipedream/types').App} App */
+/** @typedef {import('@pipedream/types').HttpResponse} HttpResponse */
+
 import { axios } from "@pipedream/platform";
 import constants from "./common/constants.mjs";

7-57: Add validation rules to property definitions.

While the properties are well-defined, consider adding validation rules for better data integrity:

     revision: {
       type: "string",
       label: "Revision",
       description: "Components typically have some differentiator like a version or commit id. Use that here. If this segment is omitted, the latest revision is used (if that makes sense for the provider).",
       optional: true,
+      validate: {
+        pattern: "^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$",
+        error: "Revision must contain only alphanumeric characters, dots, underscores, or hyphens",
+      },
     },
     // Add similar validation for other string fields
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 666b7c4 and 2691250.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • components/clearly_defined/actions/create-definition/create-definition.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/clearly_defined/actions/get-definitions/get-definitions.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/clearly_defined/actions/get-harvests/get-harvests.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/clearly_defined/clearly_defined.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/clearly_defined/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/clearly_defined/package.json (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/clearly_defined/common/constants.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/clearly_defined/package.json (2)

15-17: Verify the platform dependency version constraint.

The dependency on @pipedream/platform uses a caret range (^3.0.3) which allows patch and minor updates but not major version changes.

✅ Verification successful

Platform dependency version ^3.0.3 is appropriate

The specified version constraint follows semantic versioning best practices and matches the latest stable version used across modern components in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the specified platform version against the recommended version

# Check if package-lock.json exists and get the resolved version
if [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then
  echo "Resolved platform version from package-lock.json:"
  jq '.dependencies["@pipedream/platform"].version' package-lock.json
fi

# Check for any peer dependency requirements in other components
echo -e "\nChecking peer dependency requirements:"
rg '"@pipedream/platform"' -g 'components/*/package.json'

Length of output: 65864


3-3: Verify if the version bump aligns with semantic versioning.

The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 indicates new features without breaking changes. Let's verify this aligns with the actual changes.

✅ Verification successful

Version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate

The minor version increment aligns with semantic versioning principles as this appears to be the initial feature-complete release with multiple functional endpoints (create-definition, get-definitions, get-harvests) and no breaking changes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the extent of changes to determine if the version bump is appropriate

# Look for breaking changes in the component
echo "Checking for potential breaking changes..."
rg -l "BREAKING CHANGE" -g "components/clearly_defined/*"

# List all new files to verify feature additions
echo -e "\nNew files added (indicating new features):"
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard components/clearly_defined/

Length of output: 326


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check actual changes in the component
echo "Files in the component directory:"
ls -la components/clearly_defined/

echo -e "\nGit diff for the component:"
git diff --cached components/clearly_defined/

Length of output: 679


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all files recursively and check git status
echo "All files in component (recursive):"
find components/clearly_defined/ -type f -ls

echo -e "\nGit status for component:"
git status components/clearly_defined/

echo -e "\nContent of app.mjs:"
cat components/clearly_defined/clearly_defined.app.mjs

echo -e "\nContent of actions directory:"
ls -R components/clearly_defined/actions/

Length of output: 4259

components/clearly_defined/actions/create-definition/create-definition.mjs (1)

1-41: Well-structured component definition with proper prop declarations!

The component is well-organized with clear metadata and proper reuse of property definitions from the app module.

components/clearly_defined/actions/get-harvests/get-harvests.mjs (1)

1-47: LGTM! Consistent component structure.

The component follows the established pattern and properly reuses property definitions.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @michelle0927 lgtm! Ready for QA!

@michelle0927 michelle0927 merged commit 763548d into master Feb 3, 2025
11 checks passed
@michelle0927 michelle0927 deleted the issue-9458 branch February 3, 2025 16:06
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] clearly_defined
2 participants