-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
[ACTION] Apollo.io Add Contact to List and Remove Contact from List #15670 #15798
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes update several components, primarily focusing on version increments across various actions and sources. Notably, the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/apollo_io/actions/update-contact/update-contact.mjs
(2 hunks)components/apollo_io/apollo_io.app.mjs
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
components/apollo_io/actions/update-contact/update-contact.mjs
[warning] 9-9:
{{ts}} macro should be removed before committing
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/apollo_io/apollo_io.app.mjs (3)
176-176
: LGTM: Improved description for labelNames property.The updated description is more informative and includes helpful usage examples for creating new labels using custom expressions.
392-397
: LGTM: New method for retrieving labels.The new
listLabels
method follows the same pattern as other API methods in the file, which maintains consistency in the codebase.
178-182
:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the response structure from the labels endpoint.
The
options()
function assumes the response fromlistLabels()
is an array containing objects with aname
property. Let's verify this assumption by checking the API response structure.Also applies to: 392-397
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Capture and verify the structure of the response from the Apollo.io labels endpoint # Create a mock file for testing the API response structure cat > mockApolloResponse.js << 'EOF' const mockResponse = require('./mockResponse.json'); console.log('Response structure:', JSON.stringify(mockResponse, null, 2)); console.log('Is array?', Array.isArray(mockResponse)); if (Array.isArray(mockResponse) && mockResponse.length > 0) { console.log('First item has name property?', mockResponse[0].hasOwnProperty('name')); console.log('Sample names:', mockResponse.slice(0, 3).map(item => item.name)); } else { console.log('Expected array structure not found. Actual structure:', typeof mockResponse); if (typeof mockResponse === 'object') { console.log('Keys:', Object.keys(mockResponse)); // Check if response has a labels property that might contain the array if (mockResponse.labels && Array.isArray(mockResponse.labels)) { console.log('Found labels array. First item has name property?', mockResponse.labels[0].hasOwnProperty('name')); console.log('Sample names:', mockResponse.labels.slice(0, 3).map(item => item.name)); } } } EOF # Find API responses in the codebase to see if there's sample data rg -l "labels" --json-path "components" --include "*.json" -l | head -n 3Length of output: 513
Attention: Verify API Response Structure Manually
The initial verification script did not execute as expected due to an unsupported
--json-path
argument. Please manually confirm that thelistLabels()
function returns an array of objects with aname
property. If the API instead returns a nested structure (for instance, an object containing alabels
array), update theoptions()
function accordingly.
- Check the actual API response (or the sample in
mockResponse.json
) to ensure it’s an array.- If the response is an object with a nested array (e.g., under a
labels
key), extract that array before mapping thename
property.Also applies to: Lines 392-397.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @lcaresia I've just added a couple of request changes and in addition to that please change the version in package.json as well, thanks!
@jcortes Can you review this one? |
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements