-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
net/nanocoap: remove coap_pkt token ptr #17983
Conversation
With #17950 there shouldn't be any actual users of the pointer left - only setters, which can be removed easily. |
lets ping @kaspar030 @miri64 @chrysn if anyone suggests to have a deprecation period for |
Personally I won't insist on having a deprecation period -- especially in this case because using the old access will reliably fail. Adding @cgundogan to the pingees because I suspect he might have PRs around that might be using the token a bit more. |
1600184
to
0c22bdd
Compare
0c22bdd
to
6fe787e
Compare
0c22bdd
to
6fe787e
Compare
This needs a rebase, but we can merge this |
Murdock results✔️ PASSED b575f0c net/nanocoap: remove coap_pkt token ptr
ArtifactsThis only reflects a subset of all builds from https://ci-prod.riot-os.org. Please refer to https://ci.riot-os.org for a complete build for now. |
3c7ebf8
to
0af1e1f
Compare
0af1e1f
to
b575f0c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2022.10 is branched off, we can merge this now.
this might need a deprecation period first
Contribution description
remove the token ptr from nanocoap
coap_pkt_t
in favour ofcoap_get_token()
introduced in #17976Testing procedure
murdock build
Issues/PRs references
#17976
wait for #17950