Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 20, 2018. It is now read-only.

Docs need some work #6

Open
marcuswhit opened this issue Feb 6, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

Docs need some work #6

marcuswhit opened this issue Feb 6, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@marcuswhit
Copy link

Aside from the obvious need of covering all operators, perhaps it would make them even more useful if there was an embedded Plunker/CodePen widget that demonstrates the functionality? Same point goes (and is likely even more relevant) for the RxJS docs.

@headinthebox
Copy link

Most certainly. Send in a pull request.

@bennage
Copy link

bennage commented Feb 7, 2014

I'd love to see this for the RxJS docs. 👍

@marcuswhit
Copy link
Author

I'll see if I can make a start in the next week. But yeah, rxjs docs are
probably more needed for most - coming from .net I'm often double checking
if the slightly different operators behave as I expect!
On 7 Feb 2014 20:31, "Christopher Bennage" notifications@github.com wrote:

I'd love to see this for the RxJS docs. [image: 👍]


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/6#issuecomment-34499078
.

@Roaders
Copy link

Roaders commented Jan 11, 2017

Yeah... the docs are really not much good...

# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants