Skip to content

Add intershard_tls #572

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 24, 2021
Merged

Add intershard_tls #572

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 24, 2021

Conversation

gkorland
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gkorland gkorland requested review from K-Jo and DvirDukhan January 24, 2021 18:20
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #572 (0b099d4) into master (9829856) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #572   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.25%   78.25%           
=======================================
  Files          41       41           
  Lines        6535     6535           
=======================================
  Hits         5114     5114           
  Misses       1421     1421           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9829856...0b099d4. Read the comment docs.

@DvirDukhan DvirDukhan merged commit e460c05 into master Mar 24, 2021
@DvirDukhan DvirDukhan deleted the intershard_tls branch March 24, 2021 18:13
DvirDukhan added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2021
DvirDukhan added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2021
Merge pull request #572 from RedisAI/intershard_tls
@chayim chayim mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2021
@chayim chayim mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2021
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants