#anchor links to references items are ungrouped for @see and @alias annotations

[pete-hotchkiss]

If I assign an @see or @alias within the comment block, and the item it's referencing is documented as being inside a @group then the Core doesn't seemingly return anything useable to the theme it can use to correctly construct the correct #group-type-name reference.

This occurs regardless of if I assign the @group annotation at a file or definition level.

Going on the default theme file /views/includes/annotations/see.html.swig, I'd perhaps expect to be able to do something like

<li><span class="item__cross-type">[{{ see.context.type }}]</span> <a href="#{{ see.group }}-{{ see.context.type }}-{{ see.context.name }}"><code>{{ see.context.name }}</code></a></li>

Unless of course I'm missing something obvious, and the JS that resolves the value object this annotation template uses does actually return such a property?

[pete-hotchkiss]

Worth adding - the similar annotation for @require has a require.item.group property which holds this - and those links work correctly.

[ghost]

Am I correct in understanding that sassdoc is currently not able to @see $variables that are @grouped?

[Camwyn]

+1
Using the default theme.
If I group my mixins, the links are ungrouped links. Even ungrouped items are in a group - undefined/General.

So if I have two mixins a & b and b is in a group:

/// Mixin A
/// @see mixin-b

/// Mixin B
/// @group letters
/// @see mixin-a

I'll get two links:

file:///Users/camwyn/project/sassdoc/index.html#mixin-a
file:///Users/camwyn/project/sassdoc/index.html#mixin-b

Which should be

file:///Users/camwyn/project/sassdoc/undefined-index.html#mixin-a
file:///Users/camwyn/project/sassdoc/letters-index.html#mixin-b

[valeriangalliat]

Fixed as of sassdoc@2.7.4 and sassdoc-theme-default@2.8.5