Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Fix test_negative_ipv6_update_check #17549

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

jameerpathan111
Copy link
Contributor

Problem Statement

  • test_negative_ipv6_update_check is failing because of change in assertion message.

Solution

  • Update assertion

Related Issues

  • SAT-30972
  • SAT-30154

@jameerpathan111 jameerpathan111 added No-CherryPick PR doesnt need CherryPick to previous branches Stream Introduced in or relating directly to Satellite Stream/Master labels Feb 7, 2025
@jameerpathan111 jameerpathan111 self-assigned this Feb 7, 2025
@jameerpathan111 jameerpathan111 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2025 09:15
@jameerpathan111
Copy link
Contributor Author

jameerpathan111 commented Feb 7, 2025

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/destructive/test_fm_upgrade.py -k test_negative_ipv6_update_check

@Satellite-QE
Copy link
Collaborator

PRT Result

Build Number: 10121
Build Status: SUCCESS
PRT Comment: pytest tests/foreman/destructive/test_fm_upgrade.py -k test_negative_ipv6_update_check --external-logging
Test Result : ================= 2 passed, 242 warnings in 3212.21s (0:53:32) =================

@Satellite-QE Satellite-QE added the PRT-Passed Indicates that latest PRT run is passed for the PR label Feb 7, 2025
@Gauravtalreja1 Gauravtalreja1 merged commit 5c17f27 into SatelliteQE:master Feb 7, 2025
12 checks passed
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
No-CherryPick PR doesnt need CherryPick to previous branches PRT-Passed Indicates that latest PRT run is passed for the PR Stream Introduced in or relating directly to Satellite Stream/Master
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants