Skip to content

Allow FiniteDiff propagation for scalar problems #409

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

avik-pal
Copy link
Member

Checklist

Additional context

Fixes #408

@avik-pal avik-pal force-pushed the ap/scalar_finitediff branch 2 times, most recently from eb68026 to e96a4a9 Compare April 16, 2024 15:37
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.86%. Comparing base (e295922) to head (0dc75b4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #409      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.71%   86.86%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          46       46              
  Lines        2845     2855      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         2467     2480      +13     
+ Misses        378      375       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@avik-pal avik-pal force-pushed the ap/scalar_finitediff branch from e96a4a9 to 0dc75b4 Compare April 16, 2024 16:16
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 9a0bb8d into master Apr 17, 2024
19 of 20 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the ap/scalar_finitediff branch April 17, 2024 14:15
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Solving a nonlinear equation using NonlinearSolve.jl with AutoFiniteDiff() yields errors about dual number
2 participants