False positives in top-level-iteration

[anderseknert]

package play

import rego.v1

split_rule_name := split(input.rulePackageNameToRun, ".")

result := data.play.other[a][b][c][d] if [a, b, c, d] := split_rule_name

result := data.play.other[a][b][c] if [a, b, c] := split_rule_name

result := data.play.other[a][b] if [a, b] := split_rule_name

result := data.play.other[a] if [a] := split_rule_name

other.foo.bar := "baz"

As @srenatus pointed out on Slack, this policy, while a tad unconventional, has Regal falsely report both top-level-iteration and pointless-reassignment. I guess we should file two issues for this, but the cause is likely the same for both, so I'll split these up only if it's found not to be the case.

Boiling it down, this should work as a test case:

package play

import rego.v1

parts := split(input.parts, ".")

result := ref[a][b] if [a, b] := parts

[anderseknert]

The pointless reassignment issue moved to #1285