Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Change recommendation for Alamofire integration #92

Conversation

JonathanPorta
Copy link
Contributor

Issues with recommending Alamofire-SwiftyJSON:

  • Not updated for Xcode 6.1.
  • No longer necessary as a shim to integrate Alamofire and SwiftyJSON.
  • Adds another dependency that needs to be manually included and managed.

I feel that recommending a third, separate dependency is confusing and unnecessary to new users. It's only one line to have SwiftyJSON wrap the JSON returned by Alamofire.

Issues with recommending Alamofire-SwiftyJSON:
-  Not updated for Xcode 6.1.
-  No longer necessary as a shim to integrate Alamofire and SwiftyJSON.
- Adds another dependency that needs to be manually included and managed.
@LukeTangPL
Copy link
Member

@JonathanPorta you're right! But the pr should handle the error from Alamofire. Can you please add some error handling description?

@LukeTangPL LukeTangPL closed this Nov 12, 2014
@LukeTangPL LukeTangPL reopened this Nov 12, 2014
@JonathanPorta
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tangplin I added a simple example where the error object is checked first. I am not sure exactly if this is the best way to check the error. I am still new to Swift. :)

LukeTangPL added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2014
…n-recomendation

Change recommendation for Alamofire integration
@LukeTangPL LukeTangPL merged commit b05c10b into SwiftyJSON:master Dec 11, 2014
@JonathanPorta JonathanPorta deleted the update-alamofire-integration-recomendation branch December 12, 2014 18:50
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants