Skip to content

As a dev, I want to run check and code coverage, without testing twice the package. #67

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
statnmap opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

As a dev, I want to run check and code coverage, without testing twice the package. #67

statnmap opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
feat project ok

Comments

@statnmap
Copy link
Contributor

Run check_n_covr() instead of check ? Or let the user choose during, but default is check_n_covr().

See: ThinkR-open/fusen#156
@statnmap statnmap transferred this issue from ThinkR-open/fusen Feb 19, 2023
statnmap added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2023
@statnmap
feat: wip check and coverage
5b80958 
tags: feat, doc

Why?

- Allow check_n_covr in the package

What?

- Start the flat file

issue #67
@statnmap statnmap mentioned this issue Feb 19, 2023
Draft
@statnmap statnmap moved this to Ready in checkhelper Feb 19, 2023
@ArthurData ArthurData changed the title Run check and code coverage, without testing twice the package. As a dev, I want to run check and code coverage, without testing twice the package. Mar 29, 2023
@ArthurData ArthurData removed this from checkhelper Mar 29, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feat project ok
Projects
{checkhelper} board
Status: No status
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@statnmap @ArthurData