Improve fuzzer recursive model providers #1039
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
volivan239
approved these changes
Oct 3, 2022
AbdullinAM
pushed a commit
to AbdullinAM/UTBotJava
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2022
AbdullinAM
pushed a commit
to AbdullinAM/UTBotJava
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2022
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Minor change with recursive model providers improvements
Type of Change
How Has This Been Tested?
Automated Testing
All fuzzers tests should pass.
Manual Scenario
See #755, #988
Checklist: