-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Matroska music scanner ignores the PART_NUMBER/track metadata. #310
Comments
Hi and thanks for your feedback~ All I can say for now is that ATL does support that field. Something is telling me we're facing some sort of an edge case.
Could you please be more explicit in the repro steps I should use? I can't work with "put something like xxx". Thanks for your understanding 😉 |
@Zeugma440 Sadly, I've never touched c# in my life, so I can't really test it myself. Is there a cli tool to repl this library? I was told that Jellyfin uses this library to extract metadata. I can share an example file: https://share.voronind.com/112_440_Hz.mka |
Got it, thanks for the file. The problem has nothing to do with metadata; the file you submitted has a tiny defect (first I've fixed that for next release |
That's odd, the file was created completely with ffmpeg. Glad it's fixed now, thank you very much! <3 |
Fix is available on today's v6.16. Please close the issue if it works on your side~ |
I'll have to wait for the Jellyfin team to release with it. |
atldotnet is used by Jellyfin, and I was forwarded here.
This is the original issue: jellyfin/jellyfin#13484
Basically it seems so that PART_NUMBER/track metadata is not being parsed by atldotnet.
As per Matroska spec, quote:
Please tell if there's not enough info from this message and Jellyfin issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: