Skip to content

Lavalite vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read via Directory Traversal

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Oct 19, 2022 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Jul 7, 2023

Package

composer lavalite/cms (Composer)

Affected versions

= 9.0.0

Patched versions

None

Description

In Lavalite 9.0.0, the XSRF-TOKEN cookie is vulnerable to path traversal attacks, enabling read access to arbitrary files on the server.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Oct 18, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 19, 2022
Reviewed Jul 7, 2023
Last updated Jul 7, 2023

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

0.214%
(59th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2022-42188

GHSA ID

GHSA-cm22-88qr-7ffh

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.