Skip to content

Improper neutralization of `noscript` element content may allow XSS in Sanitize

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jan 27, 2023 in rgrove/sanitize • Updated Feb 13, 2023

Package

bundler sanitize (RubyGems)

Affected versions

>= 5.0.0, < 6.0.1

Patched versions

6.0.1

Description

Impact

Using carefully crafted input, an attacker may be able to sneak arbitrary HTML through Sanitize >= 5.0.0, < 6.0.1 when Sanitize is configured with a custom allowlist that allows noscript elements. This could result in XSS (cross-site scripting) or other undesired behavior when that HTML is rendered in a browser.

Sanitize's default configs don't allow noscript elements and are not vulnerable. This issue only affects users who are using a custom config that adds noscript to the element allowlist.

Patches

Sanitize >= 6.0.1 always removes noscript elements and their contents, even when noscript is in the allowlist.

Workarounds

Users who are unable to upgrade can prevent this issue by using one of Sanitize's default configs or by ensuring that their custom config does not include noscript in the element allowlist.

Details

The root cause of this issue is that HTML parsing rules treat the contents of a noscript element differently depending on whether scripting is enabled in the user agent. Nokogiri (the HTML parser Sanitize uses) doesn't support scripting so it follows the "scripting disabled" rules, but a web browser with scripting enabled will follow the "scripting enabled" rules. This means that Sanitize can't reliably make the contents of a noscript element safe for scripting enabled browsers. The safest thing to do is to remove the element and its contents entirely, which is now what Sanitize does in version 6.0.1 and later.

References

Credit

Thanks to David Klein from TU Braunschweig (@leeN) for reporting this issue.

References

@rgrove rgrove published to rgrove/sanitize Jan 27, 2023
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jan 28, 2023
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jan 28, 2023
Reviewed Jan 28, 2023
Last updated Feb 13, 2023

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

0.057%
(26th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2023-23627

GHSA ID

GHSA-fw3g-2h3j-qmm7

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.