Skip to content

ydb-go-sdk token in custom credentials object can leak through logs

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Oct 19, 2023 in ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk • Updated Dec 6, 2023

Package

gomod github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/v3 (Go)

Affected versions

>= 3.48.6, < 3.53.3

Patched versions

3.53.3

Description

Impact

Since ydb-go-sdk/v3.48.6 if you use a custom credentials object (implementation of interface Credentials) it may leak into logs. This happens because this object could be serialized into an error message using fmt.Errorf("something went wrong (credentials: %q)", credentials) during connection to the YDB server. Printf func use placeholder %q for string representation of argument with quotes. If an argument implements interface fmt.Stringer, it will used through String() func. In other cases used fallback - serialization with reflection.

If such logging occurred, a malicious user with access to logs could read sensitive information (i.e. credentials) information and use it to get access to the database.

Who is impacted: applications with custom credentials object with an explicit token field.

A leak could have occurred if all of these conditions were met simultaneously:

  1. The credentials object does not implement the fmt.Stringer interface (does not have a String() method) - potentially these are custom credentials. Official credentials have a String() method.
  2. There was an error connecting to YDB during driver creation via ydb.Open(...).
  3. Some logging system was configured (ydb-go-sdk does not log such errors by default).
  4. The connection error was logged into a system that a malicious user had access to.

Patches

ydb-go-sdk contains this problem in versions from v3.48.6 to v3.53.2. The fix for this problem has been released in version v3.53.3 (PR).

Workarounds

Implement the fmt.Stringer interface in your custom credentials type with explicit stringify of object state.

References

@asmyasnikov asmyasnikov published to ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk Oct 19, 2023
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 19, 2023
Reviewed Oct 19, 2023
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Oct 19, 2023
Last updated Dec 6, 2023

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

0.045%
(17th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2023-45825

GHSA ID

GHSA-q24m-6h38-5xj8

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.