Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

runservice: don't save executor task data in etcd #113

Merged

Conversation

sgotti
Copy link
Member

@sgotti sgotti commented Sep 12, 2019

Reorganize ExecutorTask to better distinguish between the task Spec and
the Status.

Split the task Spec in a sub part called ExecutorTaskSpecData that contains
tasks data that don't have to be saved in etcd because it contains data that can
be very big and can be generated starting from the run and the runconfig.

@sgotti sgotti force-pushed the runservice_dont_save_executor_data_etcd branch 3 times, most recently from fa3fd15 to dd73b99 Compare September 17, 2019 09:08
Reorganize ExecutorTask to better distinguish between the task Spec and
the Status.

Split the task Spec in a sub part called ExecutorTaskSpecData that contains
tasks data that don't have to be saved in etcd because it contains data that can
be very big and can be generated starting from the run and the runconfig.
@sgotti sgotti force-pushed the runservice_dont_save_executor_data_etcd branch from dd73b99 to 12b0214 Compare September 17, 2019 10:03
@sgotti sgotti merged commit 25c5002 into agola-io:master Sep 17, 2019
@sgotti sgotti deleted the runservice_dont_save_executor_data_etcd branch February 19, 2020 09:07
tulliobotti64 pushed a commit to tulliobotti64/agola that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2022
…utor_data_etcd

runservice: don't save executor task data in etcd
tulliobotti64 pushed a commit to tulliobotti64/agola that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2022
…utor_data_etcd

runservice: don't save executor task data in etcd
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant