-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
*scs.sessionResponseWriter does not implement http.Hijacker #188
Comments
@alexedwards would you kindly accept pull request with a fix to this error? |
I think that the correct fix here is really for the websocket library to start supporting http.ResponseController, which is the modern way of dealing with this. I've pushed a38e822 which makes |
Thank you, works like a charm! |
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Hey there! 👋 It seems like we've hit a small roadblock with the scs.sessionResponseWriter wrapper for http.response. Currently, it doesn't implement the http.Hijacker interface. So, when attempting to open a WebSocket, you might encounter the error message: websocket: response does not implement http.Hijacker.
In the past, it were using *scs.bufferedResponseWriter, which conveniently does implement the Hijacker interface.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: