Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Fix RPM DB license handling #1184

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2022

Conversation

kzantow
Copy link
Contributor

@kzantow kzantow commented Aug 30, 2022

This PR corrects handling of licenses with RPM DB parsing by including licenses in the Package.Licenses.

Fixes #660

Signed-off-by: Keith Zantow <kzantow@gmail.com>
@kzantow kzantow force-pushed the spdx-license-noassertion branch from 75adc9a to 43b225e Compare August 30, 2022 17:07
@kzantow kzantow requested a review from a team August 30, 2022 17:44
@kzantow kzantow merged commit a17ff7b into anchore:main Aug 30, 2022
@kzantow kzantow deleted the spdx-license-noassertion branch August 30, 2022 18:38
cpendery pushed a commit to cpendery/syft that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2022
aiwantaozi pushed a commit to aiwantaozi/syft that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2022
spiffcs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
Signed-off-by: Christopher Phillips <christopher.phillips@anchore.com>
spiffcs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
Signed-off-by: Christopher Phillips <christopher.phillips@anchore.com>
GijsCalis pushed a commit to GijsCalis/syft that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SPDX PackageLicenseDeclared should be NOASSERTION
2 participants