Skip to content

bug fix in hv.py under vendor #97

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2020
Merged

Conversation

AvivSham
Copy link
Contributor

This will fix the problem of higher dimension loss calculation.

@blankjul
Copy link
Collaborator

Great! Thank you for your contribution!

Did you check if the calculations are still correct?
I have not many test cases for HV yet, because the code comes from a third-party library.

@AvivSham
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes the calculations are still correct, tested it on 2D cases since this is the only working case.

@blankjul blankjul merged commit 3ee6e08 into anyoptimization:master Sep 23, 2020
blankjul added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2021
bug fix in hv.py under vendor
blankjul added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2021
bug fix in hv.py under vendor
Seth-Peters pushed a commit to Seth-Peters/pymoo that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2022
Seth-Peters pushed a commit to Seth-Peters/pymoo that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2022
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants